Real-world pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of everolimus in metastatic breast cancer

Summary Purpose  This study investigated the relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of everolimus in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in real-world practice. Methods  Twenty-two patients with mBC treated with everolimus plus exemestane were enrolled. Blood everoli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Investigational new drugs 2021-12, Vol.39 (6), p.1707-1715
Hauptverfasser: Fukudo, Masahide, Ishibashi, Kei, Kitada, Masahiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Purpose  This study investigated the relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of everolimus in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in real-world practice. Methods  Twenty-two patients with mBC treated with everolimus plus exemestane were enrolled. Blood everolimus concentrations were measured at outpatient visits. The inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was examined. The efficacy and safety endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and the cumulative incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), respectively.  Results  Blood samples were obtained from 19 consenting patients. Everolimus did not completely inhibit mTOR activity in PBMCs at therapeutic concentrations (~ 56 % maximal inhibition). The most common adverse event was stomatitis (any grade 77 %). The trough concentration (C trough ) was significantly higher in patients experiencing DLTs than in those without any DLTs ( P  = 0.030). The optimal C trough cutoff predicting DLT development was 17.3 ng/mL. The cumulative incidence of DLTs was significantly higher in patients with C trough ≥17.3 ng/mL than in other patients (sub-hazard ratio 4.87, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.53–15.5; P  = 0.007). Furthermore, the median PFS was numerically longer in patients who maintained a steady-state C trough below the threshold than in those who did not (327 days [95 % CI 103–355 days] vs. 194 days [95 % CI 45 days–not estimable]; P  = 0.35).  Conclusions  The suggested upper threshold for the therapeutic window of everolimus C trough was 17.3 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetically guided dosing may improve the efficacy and safety of everolimus for mBC, warranting further investigation in a larger study. Clinical trial registry: Not applicable.
ISSN:0167-6997
1573-0646
1573-0646
DOI:10.1007/s10637-021-01131-4