Real-world pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of everolimus in metastatic breast cancer
Summary Purpose This study investigated the relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of everolimus in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in real-world practice. Methods Twenty-two patients with mBC treated with everolimus plus exemestane were enrolled. Blood everoli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Investigational new drugs 2021-12, Vol.39 (6), p.1707-1715 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary
Purpose
This study investigated the relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of everolimus in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in real-world practice.
Methods
Twenty-two patients with mBC treated with everolimus plus exemestane were enrolled. Blood everolimus concentrations were measured at outpatient visits. The inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was examined. The efficacy and safety endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and the cumulative incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), respectively.
Results
Blood samples were obtained from 19 consenting patients. Everolimus did not completely inhibit mTOR activity in PBMCs at therapeutic concentrations (~ 56 % maximal inhibition). The most common adverse event was stomatitis (any grade 77 %). The trough concentration (C
trough
) was significantly higher in patients experiencing DLTs than in those without any DLTs (
P
= 0.030). The optimal C
trough
cutoff predicting DLT development was 17.3 ng/mL. The cumulative incidence of DLTs was significantly higher in patients with C
trough
≥17.3 ng/mL than in other patients (sub-hazard ratio 4.87, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.53–15.5;
P
= 0.007). Furthermore, the median PFS was numerically longer in patients who maintained a steady-state C
trough
below the threshold than in those who did not (327 days [95 % CI 103–355 days] vs. 194 days [95 % CI 45 days–not estimable];
P
= 0.35).
Conclusions
The suggested upper threshold for the therapeutic window of everolimus C
trough
was 17.3 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetically guided dosing may improve the efficacy and safety of everolimus for mBC, warranting further investigation in a larger study.
Clinical trial registry: Not applicable. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-6997 1573-0646 1573-0646 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10637-021-01131-4 |