M2 tumor-associated macrophages play important role in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast carcinoma

Purpose Two types of macrophages are present in tumor microenvironment. M1 macrophages exhibit potent anti-tumor properties, while M2 macrophages play the pro-tumoral roles. The presence of M2 macrophages is associated with worsened overall survival in triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2021-07, Vol.188 (1), p.37-42
Hauptverfasser: Arole, Vidya, Nitta, Hiroaki, Wei, Lai, Shen, Tiansheng, Parwani, Anil V., Li, Zaibo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Two types of macrophages are present in tumor microenvironment. M1 macrophages exhibit potent anti-tumor properties, while M2 macrophages play the pro-tumoral roles. The presence of M2 macrophages is associated with worsened overall survival in triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) patients. However, the relationship between M2 macrophages and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unknown. Methods M2 macrophages were investigated on biopsy whole sections from 66 TNBCs treated with NAC by CD163 together with other immune checkpoint markers (PD1, PD-L1 and CD8) using a multi-color immunohistochemical multiplex assay. Results Incomplete response was significantly associated with older age, lower PD-L1 expression (tumor and stroma), lower levels of CD8-positive TILs in stroma, but higher level of CD163-positive macrophages, with the level of CD163-positive M2 macrophages in peritumoral area as the strongest factor. Conclusions Our data have demonstrated that the level of CD163-positive M2 macrophages was significantly higher in TNBC patients with incomplete response than patients with complete response, suggesting M2 macrophages’ important role in predicting TNBC patients’ response to NAC.
ISSN:0167-6806
1573-7217
DOI:10.1007/s10549-021-06260-1