Patterns of video-based motion analysis use among sports physical therapists
Examine video-based motion analysis (VBMA) use among sports physical therapists. Cross-sectional observation. Survey, online-platform. American Academy of Sports Physical Therapy members (n = 261). VBMA use frequency, reasons for use, facilitators/barriers, tools used, factors associated with use. 1...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physical therapy in sport 2021-07, Vol.50, p.159-165 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Examine video-based motion analysis (VBMA) use among sports physical therapists.
Cross-sectional observation.
Survey, online-platform.
American Academy of Sports Physical Therapy members (n = 261).
VBMA use frequency, reasons for use, facilitators/barriers, tools used, factors associated with use.
194 (74.3%) used VBMA but 163 (84%) use it for ≤ 25% of their caseload. Most (57.7%) used their personal device to capture VBMA. Commonly cited reasons for use were movement analysis (93.8%) and patient education (87.6%). Barriers to use included time (30.7%), unfamiliarity with device/equipment (19.2%), and lack of device/equipment (18.4%). Younger age, advanced training, and greater time spent with return patients were each associated with use. For every 5-year increase of age, there was a 12% reduced likelihood of VBMA use (OR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.77–1.00). Board-certified sports clinical specialists were more likely to use vs. those without additional certifications/degrees (OR = 3.27; 95% CI = 1.33–8.02). Spending 30–59 (vs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1466-853X 1873-1600 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.05.003 |