Surgical Algorithms in Rhinoplasty: A Scoping Review of the Current Status
Background Algorithms define a sequence to approaching a subject. This study represents a scoping review seeking to define the role of surgical algorithms in rhinoplasty. Methods A scoping review was conducted. Pubmed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, as well as a citation searching was p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aesthetic plastic surgery 2021-12, Vol.45 (6), p.2869-2877 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Algorithms define a sequence to approaching a subject. This study represents a scoping review seeking to define the role of surgical algorithms in rhinoplasty.
Methods
A scoping review was conducted. Pubmed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, as well as a citation searching was performed to find eligible studies for review. Eligibility criteria included studies published in English, human subjects ≥ 15 years old, and all included surgical algorithms were for primary cosmetic rhinoplasty.
Results
In total, 514 studies included the key search terms. Thirty-nine studies were evaluated for data extraction. The majority of the algorithms were from USA-based publications (22/39). Flow-chart type algorithm was used in 23 and text-based algorithms in 15 of the 39 studies. Algorithms related to tip shape and/or position were most frequent (19/39), followed by those for crooked nose and dorsal height. Only 7 of the algorithms described outcomes for utilizing the algorithm.
Conclusions
Very few surgical algorithms have been published for cosmetic rhinoplasty. A minority of these studies have published outcomes. This study provides a description and summary of these algorithms and also shows that future studies could be done to further develop surgical algorithms for rhinoplasty and evaluate outcomes.
Level of Evidence III
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
http://www.springer.com |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0364-216X 1432-5241 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00266-021-02337-w |