Differential impact of four sperm preparation techniques on sperm motility, morphology, DNA fragmentation, acrosome status, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial activity: A prospective study
Background Suboptimal human semen handling in vitro may induce sperm damage. However, the effects of semen swim‐up, pellet swim‐up, density gradient, and density gradient followed by SU on sperm motility, morphology, DNA fragmentation, acrosome reaction, intracellular reactive oxygen species, and mi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Andrology (Oxford) 2021-09, Vol.9 (5), p.1549-1559 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Suboptimal human semen handling in vitro may induce sperm damage. However, the effects of semen swim‐up, pellet swim‐up, density gradient, and density gradient followed by SU on sperm motility, morphology, DNA fragmentation, acrosome reaction, intracellular reactive oxygen species, and mitochondrial activity were not fully understood.
Objectives
To study the impact of four sperm preparation techniques on sperm functional parameters.
Materials and methods
This study was conducted on 60 infertile men with a minimum sperm concentration of 20 × 106/ml and total sperm motility of ≥30%. Each raw semen sample was divided into four aliquots. Each aliquot was prepared by one of the tested techniques. Various sperm characteristics were assessed before and after sperm preparation.
Results
Density gradient and density gradient followed by SU resulted in significantly higher DNA fragmentation percentages compared with semen swim‐up (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2047-2919 2047-2927 |
DOI: | 10.1111/andr.13038 |