Travel Time to a High Volume Center Negatively Impacts Timing of Care in Rectal Cancer

•Long travel time for rectal cancer was associated with delays in care.•Surgical evaluation prior to beginning treatment was less likely with long travel.•There was no difference in disease-free survival based on travel time. Regionalization of rectal cancer surgery may lead to worse disease free su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of surgical research 2021-10, Vol.266, p.96-103
Hauptverfasser: Abelson, Jonathan S., Barron, John, Bauer, Philip S., Chapman, William C., Schad, Christine, Ohman, Kerri, Glasgow, Sean, Hunt, Steven, Mutch, Matthew, Smith, Radhika K, Wise, Paul E., Silviera, Matthew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Long travel time for rectal cancer was associated with delays in care.•Surgical evaluation prior to beginning treatment was less likely with long travel.•There was no difference in disease-free survival based on travel time. Regionalization of rectal cancer surgery may lead to worse disease free survival owing to longer travel time to reach a high volume center yet no study has evaluated this relationship at a single high volume center volume center. This was a retrospective review of rectal cancer patients undergoing surgery from 2009 to 2019 at a single high volume center. Patients were divided into two groups based on travel time. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Additional outcomes included treatment within 60 d of diagnosis, completeness of preoperative staging, and evaluation by a colorectal surgeon prior to initiation of treatment. A lower proportion of patients with long travel time began definitive treatment within 60 d of diagnosis (74.0% versus 84.0%, P= 0.01) or were seen by the treating colorectal surgeon before beginning definitive treatment (74.8% versus 85.4%, P < 0.01). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients with long travel time were significantly less likely to begin definitive treatment within 60 d of diagnosis (OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.31-0.93) or to be evaluated by a colorectal surgeon prior to initiating treatment (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.25-0.80). There were no significant differences in DFS based on travel time. Although patients with long travel times may be vulnerable to delayed, lower quality rectal cancer care, there is no difference in DFS when definitive surgery is performed at a high volume canter. Ongoing research is needed to identify explanations for delays in treatment to ensure all patients receive the highest quality care.
ISSN:0022-4804
1095-8673
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.056