Restricted antimicrobial prescribing in an area of highly prevalent antimicrobial resistance

•In total, 67.2% of prescriptions for all restricted antibiotics (rABX) were empirical.•Treatment for severe sepsis or septic shock was the only reason for rABX prescription which was an independent predictor of subsequent multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) isolation.•Among patients who were prescr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Infectious diseases now (Online) 2021-09, Vol.51 (6), p.526-531
Hauptverfasser: Samarkos, Michael, Skouloudi, Marina, Anastasopoulou, Amalia, Markogiannakis, Antonios
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•In total, 67.2% of prescriptions for all restricted antibiotics (rABX) were empirical.•Treatment for severe sepsis or septic shock was the only reason for rABX prescription which was an independent predictor of subsequent multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) isolation.•Among patients who were prescribed rABX, recent hospitalization had a high negative predictive value for MDRO infection.•Empirical rABX was inadequate in 14% of patients with microbiologically documented infection, illustrating the difficult reduction of rABX empirical use without risking inadequate treatment. To assess the predictive value for infection with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) of reasons for empirical prescription of restricted antibiotics (rABX), in a setting with high resistance rates. We prospectively studied all rABX prescriptions in a 550-bed tertiary teaching hospital from April 15 to June 14, 2018 and from September 1 to October 30, 2018. Prescribing physicians had to justify their decision by choosing one or more prespecified reasons. We reviewed 172 empirical prescriptions of rABX, which accounted for 67.2% of all rABX prescriptions. Stated reasons for empirical prescription of rABX were recent hospitalization (72.7%), escalation due to non-response to previous antimicrobials (47.7%), treatment for severe sepsis/septic shock (45.9%), escalation due to recurrence or deterioration (22.1%), prior MDRO infection (12.8%), and prior MDRO colonization (7.6%). Empirical treatment for septic shock or severe sepsis was the only significant predictor of MDRO isolation (OR=5.26, 95% CI: 1.5–18.4, P=0.009), while recent hospitalization had a high negative predictive value for MDRO (97.4%). Fourteen per cent of microbiologically documented infections were associated with MDROs resistant to the prescribed rABX. Empirical treatment for severe sepsis or septic shock was the only independent predictor of MDRO isolation. Recent hospitalization had a high negative predictive value for MDRO infection. The isolation of pathogens resistant to the prescribed rABX suggests that in a setting with widespread antimicrobial resistance, it could be difficult to reduce the empirical use of rABX without risking inadequate treatment.
ISSN:2666-9919
2666-9919
DOI:10.1016/j.idnow.2021.05.002