Resource recovery from landfill leachate: An experimental investigation and perspectives

This work investigates the performances of coconut shell waste-based activated carbon (CSWAC) adsorption in batch studies for removal of ammoniacal nitrogen (NH3–N) and refractory pollutants (as indicated by decreasing COD concentration) from landfill leachate. To valorize unused resources, coconut...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemosphere (Oxford) 2021-07, Vol.274, p.129986-129986, Article 129986
Hauptverfasser: Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono, Singh, Deepak, Avtar, Ram, Othman, Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan, Hwang, Goh Hui, Albadarin, Ahmad B., Rezakazemi, Mashallah, Setiadi, Tjandra, Shirazian, Saeed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This work investigates the performances of coconut shell waste-based activated carbon (CSWAC) adsorption in batch studies for removal of ammoniacal nitrogen (NH3–N) and refractory pollutants (as indicated by decreasing COD concentration) from landfill leachate. To valorize unused resources, coconut shell, recovered and recycled from agricultural waste, was converted into activated carbon, which can be used for leachate treatment. The ozonation of the CSWAC was conducted to enhance its removal performance for target pollutants. The adsorption mechanisms of refractory pollutants by the adsorbent are proposed. Perspectives on nutrient recovery technologies from landfill leachate from the view-points of downstream processing are presented. Their removal efficiencies for both recalcitrant compounds and ammoniacal nitrogen were compared to those of other techniques reported in previous work. It is found that the ozonated CSWAC substantially removed COD (i.e. 76%) as well as NH3–N (i.e. 75%), as compared to the CSWAC without pretreatment (i.e. COD: 44%; NH3–N: 51%) with NH3–N and COD concentrations of 2750 and 8500 mg/L, respectively. This reveals the need of ozonation for the adsorbent to improve its performance for the removal of COD and NH3–N at optimized reactions: 30 g/L of CSWAC, pH 8, 200 rpm of shaking speed and 20 min of reaction time. Nevertheless, treatment of the leachate samples using the ozonated CSWAC alone was still unable to result in treated effluents that could meet the COD and NH3–N discharge standards below 200 and 5 mg/L, respectively, set by legislative requirements. This reveals that another treatment is necessary to be undertaken to comply with the requirement of their effluent limit. [Display omitted] •Ozone-modified CSWAC is effective for COD and NH3–N removal from leachate samples.•75% COD and NH3–N were removed at 8500 and 2750 mg/L of COD and NH3–N concentration.•Optimum conditions: 30 g/L of dose; 200 rpm of shaking speed; pH 8; 20 min.•Attractive columbic forces play roles in removing target compounds by ozonated CSWAC.•Treated effluents could not meet the limit of COD and NH3–N set by legislative requirement.
ISSN:0045-6535
1879-1298
DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129986