Impact of High-Deductible Health Plans on Medication Use Among Individuals With Bipolar Disorder

Objective: High-deductible health plans (HDHPs) require substantial out-of-pocket spending for most services, although medications may be subject to traditional copayment arrangements. This study examined effects of HDHPs on medication out-of-pocket spending and use and quality of care among individ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2021-08, Vol.72 (8), p.926-934
Hauptverfasser: Lu, Christine Y, Busch, Alisa B, Zhang, Fang, Madden, Jeanne M, Callahan, Matthew X, LeCates, Robert F, Wallace, Jamie, Foxworth, Phyllis, Soumerai, Stephen B, Ross-Degnan, Dennis, Wharam, J. Frank
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: High-deductible health plans (HDHPs) require substantial out-of-pocket spending for most services, although medications may be subject to traditional copayment arrangements. This study examined effects of HDHPs on medication out-of-pocket spending and use and quality of care among individuals with bipolar disorder. Methods: This quasi-experimental study used claims data (2003–2014) for a national sample of 3,532 members with bipolar disorder, ages 12–64, continuously enrolled for 1 year in a low-deductible plan (≤$500) and then for 1 year in an HDHP (≥$1,000) after an employer-mandated switch. HDHP members were matched to 18,923 contemporaneous individuals in low-deductible plans (control group). Outcome measures were out-of-pocket spending and use of bipolar disorder medications, psychotropics for other disorders, and all other medications and appropriate laboratory monitoring for psychotropics. Results: Relative to the control group, annual out-of-pocket spending per person for bipolar disorder medications increased 20.8% among HDHP members (95% confidence interval [CI]=14.9%–26.7%), and the absolute increase was $36 (95% CI=$25.9–$45.2). Specifically, out-of-pocket spending increased for antipsychotics (27.1%; 95% CI=17.4%–36.7%) and anticonvulsants (19.2%; 95% CI=11.9%–26.6%) but remained stable for lithium (−3.7%; 95% CI=–12.2% to 4.8%). No statistically significant changes were detected in use of bipolar disorder medications, other psychotropics, or all other medications or in appropriate laboratory monitoring for bipolar disorder medications. Conclusions: HDHP members with bipolar disorder experienced a moderate increase in out-of-pocket spending for medications but preserved bipolar disorder medication use. Findings may reflect individuals’ perceptions of the importance of these medications for their functioning and well-being.
ISSN:1075-2730
1557-9700
DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.202000362