A novel model with nutrition-related parameters for predicting overall survival of cancer patients
Background Increasing evidence indicates that nutritional status could influence the survival of cancer patients. This study aims to develop and validate a nomogram with nutrition-related parameters for predicting the overall survival of cancer patients. Patients and methods A total of 8749 patients...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Supportive care in cancer 2021-11, Vol.29 (11), p.6721-6730 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Increasing evidence indicates that nutritional status could influence the survival of cancer patients. This study aims to develop and validate a nomogram with nutrition-related parameters for predicting the overall survival of cancer patients.
Patients and methods
A total of 8749 patients from the multicentre cohort study in China were included as the primary cohort to develop the nomogram, and 696 of these patients were recruited as a validation cohort. Patients’ nutritional status were assessed using the PG-SGA. LASSO regression models and Cox regression analysis were used for factor selection and nomogram development. The nomogram was then evaluated for its effectiveness in discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness by the C-index, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used to compare the survival rate.
Results
Seven independent prognostic factors were identified and integrated into the nomogram. The C-index was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.74) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.81) for the primary cohort and validation cohort, which were both higher than 0.59 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.61) of the TNM staging system. DCA demonstrated that the nomogram was higher than the TNM staging system and the TNM staging system combined with PG-SGA. Significantly median overall survival differences were found by stratifying patients into different risk groups (score |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0941-4355 1433-7339 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00520-021-06272-z |