Decision Making of Artificial Nutrition and Hydration for Cancer Patients at Terminal Stage—A Systematic Review of the Views From Patients, Families, and Healthcare Professionals
Decision making on nutrition and hydration for cancer patients during terminal stage cause critical impacts toward patient's comfort and living quality. The management of nutrition is the main dilemma that arises in these final situations and has been the subject of intense debate over the last...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pain and symptom management 2021-11, Vol.62 (5), p.1065-1078 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Decision making on nutrition and hydration for cancer patients during terminal stage cause critical impacts toward patient's comfort and living quality. The management of nutrition is the main dilemma that arises in these final situations and has been the subject of intense debate over the last few decades.
To find the views of patients, families, and healthcare professionals related to how decisions are made when cancer patients are at terminal stage.
This systematic review used PRISMA strategy to search and used Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist to evaluate the papers.
All English papers through August 2020 that contained the view of the decision making at artificial nutrition and hydration with cancer patients, families, and healthcare professionals at terminal stage were included. Selected studies were independently reviewed, and data collaboratively synthesized into core themes.
Most of the terminal stage cancer patients and their families initially started the decision-making process when facing the reduction of oral intake. There are two primary considerations of patients and families, one is for prolonging patients life, and the other is to maintain their life quality. The voices of patients were influential, but not determinative; families usually had influence, but seldom make the final recommendation by themselves; healthcare professionals frequently face the dilemma about their decision.
The decision of nutritional support was dynamic; the interaction between patients and families frequently be hesitated to protect the rights of life, unnecessarily prolonging lifetime. Therefore, a better understanding of the views on nutritional support and processing the clinical guideline of decision making for healthcare professional is necessary. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0885-3924 1873-6513 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.04.013 |