Multifaceted array‐based keloidal gene expression profiling reveals specific MDFI upregulation in keloid lesions

Summary Background Keloid lesions are characterized by mesenchymal cell proliferation and excessive extracellular matrix deposition. Previous microarray analyses have been performed to investigate the mechanism of keloid development. However, the molecular pathology that contributes to keloid develo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and experimental dermatology 2021-10, Vol.46 (7), p.1255-1261
Hauptverfasser: Asai, M., Koike, Y., Kuwatsuka, Y., Yagi, Y., Kashiyama, K., Tanaka, K., Mishima, H., Yoshiura, K., Utani, A., Murota, H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background Keloid lesions are characterized by mesenchymal cell proliferation and excessive extracellular matrix deposition. Previous microarray analyses have been performed to investigate the mechanism of keloid development. However, the molecular pathology that contributes to keloid development remains obscure. Aim To explore the underlying essential molecules of keloids using microarrays. Methods We performed microarray analyses of keloid and nonlesional skin tissues both in vivo and in vitro. Gene expression levels were compared between tissues and cells. Quantitative reverse transcription (qRT)‐PCR and immunohistochemical staining were used to determine the expression levels of molecules of interest in keloid tissues. Results Several common molecules were upregulated in both keloid tissues and keloid‐lesional fibroblasts. PTPRD and NTM were upregulated both in vivo and in vitro. The genes MDFI and ITGA4 were located at the centre of the gene coexpression network analysis using keloid tissues. qRT‐PCR revealed significant expression levels of PTPRD and MDFI in keloid tissues. Immunopathological staining revealed that MDFI‐positive cells, which have fibroblast characteristics, were located in the keloid‐associated lymphoid tissue (KALT) portion of the keloid tissue. Conclusion Our gene expression profiles of keloids could distinguish the difference between lesional tissue and cultured lesional fibroblasts, and MDFI was found to be commonly expressed in both tissues and cells. Thus, MDFI‐positive cells, which were located in the KALT, may play an important role in keloid pathogenesis and thus might be useful for in vitro keloid studies.
ISSN:0307-6938
1365-2230
DOI:10.1111/ced.14698