Secondary overtriage of isolated facial trauma
Retrospective chart review. Academic, tertiary care, level I trauma center in a rural state. Unnecessary transfer of certain facial trauma patients results in a burden of time, money, and other resources on both the patient and healthcare system; identification and development of outpatient treatmen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of otolaryngology 2021-09, Vol.42 (5), p.103043-103043, Article 103043 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Retrospective chart review.
Academic, tertiary care, level I trauma center in a rural state.
Unnecessary transfer of certain facial trauma patients results in a burden of time, money, and other resources on both the patient and healthcare system; identification and development of outpatient treatment pathways for these patients is a significant opportunity for cost savings.
To investigate the treatment and disposition of un-complicated, stable, isolated facial trauma injuries transferred from outside hospitals and determine the significance of secondary overtriage.
Retrospective chart review utilizing our institutional trauma database, including patients transferred to our emergency department between January 2012 and December 2017. Patients were identified by ICD9 or ICD10 codes and only those with isolated facial trauma were included.
We identified 538 isolated facial trauma patients who were transferred to our institution during the study period. The majority of those patients were transferred via ground ambulance for an average of 76 miles. Overall, 82% of patients (N = 440) were discharged directly from our institution's emergency department. Almost 30% of patients did not require any formal treatment for their injuries; the potential savings associated with elimination of these unnecessary transfers was estimated to be between $388,605 and $771,372.
We identified a high rate of patients with stable, isolated facial trauma that could potentially be evaluated and treated without emergent transfer. The minimization of these unnecessary transfers represents a significant opportunity for cost and resource utilization savings.
2b- Economic and Cost Analysis.
•Almost 1/3 of urgently transferred facial trauma patients don’t require admission or immediate intervention(s).•Reducing urgent transfer of certain facial traumas can substantially save time, money, and resources for patients and health systems.•A triage protocol between referring and receiving hospitals can determine which facial trauma patients need to be seen urgently. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0196-0709 1532-818X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103043 |