Frailty and Cognitive Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional Studies

The relationship between cognitive function and frailty among older adults is a growing area of research due to the implications of cognitive and physical decline for functional independence in late life. Multiple studies demonstrate a meaningful relationship between these two factors, which togethe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuropsychology review 2022-06, Vol.32 (2), p.274-293
Hauptverfasser: Robinson, Talia L., Gogniat, Marissa A., Miller, L. Stephen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The relationship between cognitive function and frailty among older adults is a growing area of research due to the implications of cognitive and physical decline for functional independence in late life. Multiple studies demonstrate a meaningful relationship between these two factors, which together may constitute increased risk of negative health outcomes for older adults. The current analysis was conducted to 1) systematically review current evidence for differences in cognitive performance based on frailty status among older adults and provide quantitative evidence for the magnitude of this effect, and 2) assess the influence of demographic and methodological variables on this effect. The preregistered protocol (CRD42018087138) included a search of EBSCOhost, Pubmed, and Embase online databases and reference lists to identify cross-sectional studies comparing frail and non-frail or robust older adults (60+) on cognitive performance. In total, 42 effects were retrieved from 38 studies, expressed as Hedges’ g, and pooled based on a random-effects model. Results indicated an overall significant, negative effect of frailty status on cognitive function among tests of global cognitive function ( g = 0.734: 95% CI = 0.601-0.867) and individual cognitive domains ( g = 0.439: 95% CI = 0.342–0.535). Age, frailty assessment used, and cognitive status of the sample did not significantly moderate the overall effect. Post-hoc moderator analysis revealed that difference in mean age of frail and robust groups significantly moderated the overall effect (R 2 = 0.38, β = .0974, 95% CI = 0.0537-0.141). Implications for future research are discussed.
ISSN:1040-7308
1573-6660
DOI:10.1007/s11065-021-09497-1