Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

It remains controversial whether the advantages of robotic-assisted surgery are beneficial for rectal cancer (RC). The study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted rectal surgery (RARS) compared with those of conventional laparoscopic-assisted rectal surgery. We retrospectivel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of robotic surgery 2022-04, Vol.16 (2), p.323-331
Hauptverfasser: Sueda, Toshinori, Tei, Mitsuyoshi, Nishida, Kentaro, Yoshikawa, Yukihiro, Matsumura, Tae, Koga, Chikato, Wakasugi, Masaki, Miyagaki, Hiromichi, Kawabata, Ryohei, Tsujie, Masanori, Hasegawa, Junichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:It remains controversial whether the advantages of robotic-assisted surgery are beneficial for rectal cancer (RC). The study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted rectal surgery (RARS) compared with those of conventional laparoscopic-assisted rectal surgery. We retrospectively analyzed 539 consecutive patients with stage I–IV RC who had undergone elective surgery between January 2010 and December 2020, using propensity score-matched analysis. After propensity score matching, we enrolled 200 patients ( n  = 100 in each groups). Before matching, significant group-dependent differences were observed in terms of age ( p  = 0.04) and body mass index ( p  
ISSN:1863-2483
1863-2491
DOI:10.1007/s11701-021-01243-2