Inter- and intra-observer reliability of radiological grading systems for knee osteoarthritis

Introduction Radiographs are the first-line investigation for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Antero-posterior (AP) and Rosenberg views have demonstrated varying sensitivities in detecting severe OA. There is a multitude of radiological grading systems described. The aim of this study was to assess four c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Skeletal radiology 2021-10, Vol.50 (10), p.2069-2078
Hauptverfasser: Eckersley, Thomas, Faulkner, Jordan, Al-Dadah, Oday
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Radiographs are the first-line investigation for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Antero-posterior (AP) and Rosenberg views have demonstrated varying sensitivities in detecting severe OA. There is a multitude of radiological grading systems described. The aim of this study was to assess four commonly used grading systems in terms of inter- and intra-observer reliability and correlate the results with patient-reported symptom severity. Materials and methods This study included 100 patients who had undergone both AP and Rosenberg X-ray views of the knee and evaluated using four radiological grading systems. These included Kellgren & Lawrence (K&L), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Ahlbäck and Fairbank. Evaluations were performed by two observers, independently, at two separate time points, 8 weeks apart. The data was then statistically analysed and inter- and intra-observer reliability calculated. Results A significant difference was found between AP and Rosenberg views for all four grading systems ( p  
ISSN:0364-2348
1432-2161
DOI:10.1007/s00256-021-03767-y