The stability of implants and microbiological effects following photobiomodulation therapy with one‐stage placement: A randomized, controlled, single‐blinded, and split‐mouth clinical study

Background Studies have reported a positive effect on bone healing and the elimination of microorganisms placed on the titanium implants, while others have not confirmed the positive photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) effects on bone regeneration and bone structure around the implants. Purpose The ai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2021-06, Vol.23 (3), p.329-340
Hauptverfasser: Bozkaya, Suleyman, Uraz, Ahu, Guler, Berceste, Kahraman, Sevil Altundağ, Turhan Bal, Bilge
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Studies have reported a positive effect on bone healing and the elimination of microorganisms placed on the titanium implants, while others have not confirmed the positive photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) effects on bone regeneration and bone structure around the implants. Purpose The aim of the present study was to address the following questions: Does PBMT improve implant stability and affect microbiota around dental implants in the early stage of osseointegration? Materials and Methods This study was designed as randomized‐controlled prospective, split mouth, single‐blinded clinical trial. Implants were randomly divided into two groups and implants placed in the test group were treated with Gallium‐aluminum‐arsenide (GaAlAs) diode laser with PBMT immediately after surgery and for 15 days (n = 47). In the control group, implants were not irradiated(n = 46). The primary stability of the implants was measured by the Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) after insertion and the secondary stability values were recorded at 30th, 60th, and 90th days after surgery as implant stability quotient (ISQ). The hand‐held RFA was held perpendicular to the jaw line as indicated by the manufacturer for buccal‐lingual (BL), mesial‐distal (MD), and lingual‐buccal (LB) measurement and different measurements were analyzed as separately. Results Significantly higher magnetic RFA values were achieved on the 90th day in all measurement sides for both groups. ISQ levels in groups at baseline and the day‐30, 60, and 90. ISQ readings were not statistically significant between test and control groups for each time point. A statistically significant increase in ISQ reading for BL, MD, and LB dimensions in both groups was noted from baseline to the day‐90 (P 
ISSN:1523-0899
1708-8208
DOI:10.1111/cid.12999