Matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionisation‐time of flight mass spectrometry: Protocol standardisation, comparison and database expansion for faster and reliable identification of dermatophytes
Background Accurate and early identification of dermatophytes enables prompt antifungal therapy. However, phenotypic and molecular identification methods are time‐consuming. MALDI‐TOF MS‐based identification is rapid, but an optimum protocol is not available. Objectives To develop and validate an op...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Mycoses 2021-08, Vol.64 (8), p.926-935 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Accurate and early identification of dermatophytes enables prompt antifungal therapy. However, phenotypic and molecular identification methods are time‐consuming. MALDI‐TOF MS‐based identification is rapid, but an optimum protocol is not available.
Objectives
To develop and validate an optimum protein extraction protocol for the efficient and accurate identification of dermatophytes by MALDI‐TOF MS.
Materials/methods
Trichophyton mentagrophytes complex (n = 4), T. rubrum (n = 4) and Microsporum gypseum (n = 4) were used for the optimisation of protein extraction protocols. Thirteen different methods were evaluated. A total of 125 DNA sequence confirmed clinical isolates of dermatophytes were used to create and expand the existing database. The accuracy of the created database was checked by visual inspection of MALDI spectra, MSP dendrogram and composite correlation index matrix analysis. The protocol was validated further using 234 isolates.
Result
Among 13 protein extraction methods, six correctly identified dermatophytes but with a low log score (≤1.0). The modified extraction protocol developed provided an elevated log score of 1.6. Significant log score difference was observed between the modified protocol and other existing protocols (T. mentagrophytes complex: 1.6 vs. 0.2–1.0, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0933-7407 1439-0507 |
DOI: | 10.1111/myc.13285 |