Temperate and chronic virus competition leads to low lysogen frequency

[Display omitted] •We model competition between temperate and chronic viruses for bacterial hosts.•Low lysogen frequency benefits both temperate and chronic virus lifestyles.•Chronic viruses maximize abundance by eliminating lysogeny entirely.•Temperate viruses exhibit a non-zero sweet spot lysogen frequency.•We deduce typical recovery rates of bacteria from viral infection. The canonical bacteriophage is obligately lytic: the virus infects a bacterium and hijacks cell functions to produce large numbers of new viruses which burst from the cell. These viruses are well-studied, but there exist a wide range of coexisting virus lifestyles that are less understood. Temperate viruses exhibit both a lytic cycle and a latent (lysogenic) cycle, in which viral genomes are integrated into the bacterial host. Meanwhile, chronic (persistent) viruses use cell functions to produce more viruses without killing the cell; chronic viruses may also exhibit a latent stage in addition to the productive stage. Here, we study the ecology of these competing viral strategies. We demonstrate the conditions under which each strategy is dominant, which aids in control of human bacterial infections using viruses. We find that low lysogen frequencies provide competitive advantages for both virus types; however, chronic viruses maximize steady state density by eliminating lysogeny entirely, while temperate viruses exhibit a non-zero ‘sweet spot’ lysogen frequency. Viral steady state density maximization leads to coexistence of temperate and chronic viruses, explaining the presence of multiple viral strategies in natural environments.