Surgical Merits of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gastrectomy Techniques with D2 Lymphadenectomy in Obese Patients with Gastric Cancer

Background Robotic surgery has been widely adopted for complex procedures to overcome technical limitations of open or laparoscopic methods. However, evidence of any subsequent benefit is lacking. This study was undertaken to compare open, laparoscopic, and robotic gastrectomy in technically demandi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2021-11, Vol.28 (12), p.7051-7060
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Seohee, Song, Jeong Ho, Lee, Sejin, Cho, Minah, Kim, Yoo Min, Hyung, Woo Jin, Kim, Hyoung-Il
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Robotic surgery has been widely adopted for complex procedures to overcome technical limitations of open or laparoscopic methods. However, evidence of any subsequent benefit is lacking. This study was undertaken to compare open, laparoscopic, and robotic gastrectomy in technically demanding procedure—D2 dissection in obese patients with gastric cancer. Methods Data collected between 2010 and 2018 on D2 gastrectomy in obese patients with gastric cancer were used to conduct retrospective analysis, comparing short- and long-term outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic techniques. Results In a total of 185 patients, there were 69 open, 62 laparoscopic, and 54 robotic gastrectomy procedures. Median ages for respective surgical groups were 66 (interquartile range [IQR]: 61–64 years), 63 (IQR: 59–63), and 59 years (IQR: 56–60 years) ( p  = 0.009). Early-stage gastric cancer ranked proportionately higher in the laparoscopic group ( p  = 0.005), but operative times were similar among groups. Estimated blood loss ( p  
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-021-09952-6