Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay evaluation using clinical samples from different testing groups

Compared to RT-PCR, lower performance of antigen detection assays, including the Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay, may depend on specific testing scenarios. We tested 594 nasopharyngeal swab samples from individuals with COVID-19 (RT-PCR cycle threshold [Ct] values ≤ 40) or non-COVID-19 (Ct values &g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2021-07, Vol.59 (8), p.1468-1476
Hauptverfasser: Menchinelli, Giulia, Bordi, Licia, Liotti, Flora Marzia, Palucci, Ivana, Capobianchi, Maria Rosaria, Sberna, Giuseppe, Lalle, Eleonora, Romano, Lucio, De Angelis, Giulia, Marchetti, Simona, Sanguinetti, Maurizio, Cattani, Paola, Posteraro, Brunella
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Compared to RT-PCR, lower performance of antigen detection assays, including the Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay, may depend on specific testing scenarios. We tested 594 nasopharyngeal swab samples from individuals with COVID-19 (RT-PCR cycle threshold [Ct] values ≤ 40) or non-COVID-19 (Ct values > 40) diagnoses. RT-PCR positive samples were assigned to diagnostic, screening, or monitoring groups of testing. With a limit of detection of 1.2 × 10 SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies/ml, Lumipulse showed positive percent agreement (PPA) of 79.9% (155/194) and negative percent agreement of 99.3% (397/400), whereas PPAs were 100% for samples with Ct values of
ISSN:1434-6621
1437-4331
DOI:10.1515/cclm-2021-0182