Translation and validation of the Japanese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Questionnaire

Purpose Patient-reported outcomes after surgery and anaesthesia have recently attracted attention. A recent systematic review and a consensus guideline recommend that patients’ recovery can be adequately measured using the quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) during the perioperative period; however, the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of anesthesia 2021-06, Vol.35 (3), p.426-433
Hauptverfasser: Nakatani, Shohei, Ida, Mitsuru, Tanaka, Yuu, Okamoto, Naoko, Wang, Xiaoying, Nakatani, Hitomi, Sato, Mariko, Naito, Yusuke, Kawaguchi, Masahiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Patient-reported outcomes after surgery and anaesthesia have recently attracted attention. A recent systematic review and a consensus guideline recommend that patients’ recovery can be adequately measured using the quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) during the perioperative period; however, the Japanese version of the QoR-15 (QoR-15J) is not available. We aimed to translate the QoR-15 into Japanese and assess its validity. Methods After translating into Japanese, 205 patients who underwent various types of surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled in the study. QoR-15J was evaluated before surgery and 24 h and 48 h after surgery. Additionally, 30 patients answered the QoR-15J at 25 h after surgery. We assessed the feasibility, reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the QoR-15J. Results One patient who did not undergo surgery and two patients who were discharged within 24 h were excluded. One hundred and eighty-seven patients answered the QoR-15J at 24 h after surgery (completion rate, 92.6%) and 183 patients with complete data were included in the final analysis. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for internal reliability and Spearman rank correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability were 0.84 and 0.91, respectively. The Cohen effect size for all items was 1.42. Conclusions QoR-15 was translated into Japanese and the Japanese version’s validity was assessed in patients undergoing various types of surgery under general anaesthesia. Our results suggest that QoR-15J is feasible, reliable, valid, and responsive.
ISSN:0913-8668
1438-8359
DOI:10.1007/s00540-021-02921-z