Occlusal Outcome of Orthodontic Treatment for Patients With Complete Cleft Lip and Palate
Aim: To assess occlusal outcomes of orthodontic treatment for patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Design: Retrospective assessment using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index. Setting: Consecutive patients treated by one consultant orthodontist at a tertiary care cleft center. Participants...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal 2022-01, Vol.59 (1), p.79-85 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim:
To assess occlusal outcomes of orthodontic treatment for patients with complete cleft lip and palate.
Design:
Retrospective assessment using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index.
Setting:
Consecutive patients treated by one consultant orthodontist at a tertiary care cleft center.
Participants:
One hundred twenty-seven patients with either complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) or bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) consecutively treated with fixed appliances.
Intervention:
Fixed orthodontic appliance treatment and orthognathic surgery when required.
Outcomes:
The PAR index assessment was carried out by a calibrated-independent assessor. Treatment duration, the number of patient visits, and data on dental anomalies were drawn from patient records and radiographs.
Results:
One hundred two patients’ study models were assessed after exclusions. Mean start PAR score for UCLP (n = 71) was 43.9 (95% CI, 41.2-46.6, SD 11.5), with a mean score reduction of 84.3% (95% CI, 81.9-86.7, SD 10.1). The UCLP mean treatment time was 23.7 months with 20.1 appointments. Mean start PAR score for BCLP (n = 31) was 43.4 (95% CI, 39.2-47.6, SD 11.4), with a mean score reduction of 80.9% (95% CI, 76.3-85.5, SD 12.5). The BCLP mean treatment time was 27.8 months with 20.5 appointments.
Conclusion:
These results compare well with other outcome reports, including those for patients without a cleft, and reflect the standard of care provided by an experienced cleft orthodontist. As with high-volume surgeons, orthodontic treatment for this high need group is favorable when provided by a high-volume orthodontist. These findings may be used for comparative audit with similar units providing cleft care. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1055-6656 1545-1569 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1055665621996116 |