Correlation between 2D and 3D measurements of cement space in CAD-CAM crowns

Although the 2D analysis of prosthesis cementation space has been popular, its correlation with volumetric comparison (3D data) of cement space is unclear. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the cement space in computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) crowns o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2022-10, Vol.128 (4), p.688-694
Hauptverfasser: Piras, Fernanda Furtado, Ferruzzi, Fernanda, Ferrairo, Brunna Mota, Mosquim, Victor, Ramalho, Ilana Santos, Bonfante, Estevam Augusto, Rubo, José Henrique
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Although the 2D analysis of prosthesis cementation space has been popular, its correlation with volumetric comparison (3D data) of cement space is unclear. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the cement space in computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) crowns of different materials and correlate 2D measurements of cement space with their corresponding 3D values (volume of cement space) by using microcomputed tomography (μCT) analysis of regions of interest. Ten molar crowns were milled in lithium disilicate (LD), resin nanoceramic (RN), and zirconia (Z) ceramics. Silicone replicas were produced and used as the analog cement layer and scanned with a desktop X-ray microfocus CT scanner. Twenty-eight slices were evaluated in 3 regions: marginal, axial, and occlusal (n=84 measurement points/specimen). After 3D reconstruction of the cement space, the volume was calculated. Data were statistically evaluated through 2-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test (α=.05). The Pearson correlation test was used to investigate the correlation between the 2D and 3D data. The volumes of the occlusal (LD 10 ±1 mm3; RN 9 ±1 mm3) and axial regions (LD 9 ±2 mm3; RN 8 ±1 mm3) were significantly higher than the volume of the marginal region for LD and RN specimens (LD 6 ±2 mm3; RN 4 ±1 mm3) (both P
ISSN:0022-3913
1097-6841
DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.051