Endovascular and medical therapy of May–Thurner syndrome: Case series and scoping literature review

May–Thurner syndrome has been recognized as a cause of chronic venous insufficiency and a trigger for venous thromboembolism. There is no consensus about the definition, diagnosis, and therapeutic approach. We are aiming to describe its characteristics and a scoping literature review. A retrospectiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal de médecine vasculaire 2021-04, Vol.46 (2), p.80-89
Hauptverfasser: Montes, M.C., Carbonell, J.P., Gómez-Mesa, J.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:May–Thurner syndrome has been recognized as a cause of chronic venous insufficiency and a trigger for venous thromboembolism. There is no consensus about the definition, diagnosis, and therapeutic approach. We are aiming to describe its characteristics and a scoping literature review. A retrospective review of patients with May–Thurner syndrome from March 2010 to May 2018 and scoping literature review were made. Seven patients were identified. All patients were female with a median age of 36 (20–60) years. The median time from the first symptom to diagnosis was 3.41 (0.01–9) years. The primary clinical presentation was post-thrombotic syndrome (4 patients). Six patients had at least one risk factor for deep venous thrombosis. All patients underwent angioplasty with stent; patients with acute deep venous thrombosis, furthermore mechanic thrombectomy with or without catheter-directed thrombolysis were done. There were three complications (one patient, lymphedema, and two venous stent thrombosis). Scoping review results were descriptively summarized. May–Thurner syndrome has a varied spectrum of clinical presentation, and clinical awareness is paramount for diagnosis. Its principal complication is the post-thrombotic syndrome, which is associated with high morbidity. There is no consensus on the antithrombotic treatment approach.
ISSN:2542-4513
DOI:10.1016/j.jdmv.2021.02.004