The Needs of Dutch Women During Decision-Making About Treatment for Miscarriage

To explore the needs of women during decision-making about treatment for miscarriage. Descriptive qualitative design. University and teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. We selected a purposive sample of 16 women who needed treatment for miscarriage from an electronic patient file system. We ensur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing gynecologic, and neonatal nursing, 2021-07, Vol.50 (4), p.439-449
Hauptverfasser: Bussink-Legters, Anja G., den Hoogen, Agnes van, Veersema, Sebastiaan, Meijer, Wouter J., Ockhuijsen, Henrietta D.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To explore the needs of women during decision-making about treatment for miscarriage. Descriptive qualitative design. University and teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. We selected a purposive sample of 16 women who needed treatment for miscarriage from an electronic patient file system. We ensured maximum variation by sampling in different hospitals and selecting women with different ages, numbers of children, miscarriage histories, treatment types, and educational levels. We conducted face-to-face individual, semistructured interviews and used thematic analysis to identify, analyze, and describe themes. We identified one overarching theme, Decision Based on Reason and Emotion, and three related subthemes: Certainty, Information, and SupportFrom Environment. Health care professionals should be aware of how women’s decision-making is structured in the context of treatment choices for miscarriage, and discussion regarding treatment should address reason and emotion. Health care professionals can support women in the decision-making process regarding treatment for miscarriage by addressing rational and emotional factors.
ISSN:0884-2175
1552-6909
DOI:10.1016/j.jogn.2021.02.006