Should methyldibromo glutaronitrile continue to be used in the European baseline Series? A REIDAC national cross‐sectional study

Background Methyldibromo glutaronitrile (MDBGN) was one of the most frequent and relevant allergens found in patch testing at the beginning of this century. In 2008, this preservative was banned from cosmetics in Europe and ever since the prevalence of contact allergy to MDBGN has progressively decr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contact dermatitis 2021-11, Vol.85 (5), p.572-577
Hauptverfasser: Mercader‐García, Pedro, Pastor‐Nieto, María Antonia, Gonzalez‐Perez, Ricardo, Cordoba‐Guijarro, Susana, Gimenez‐Arnau, Ana María, Ruiz‐Gonzalez, Inmaculada, Mora‐Fernández, Verónica, Miquel, Javier, Silvestre‐Salvador, Juan Francisco, Ortiz‐Frutos, Francisco Javier, Sanz‐Sanchez, Tatiana, Rodriguez‐Serna, Mercedes, Perez‐Feal, Patricia, Sánchez‐Pérez, Javier, Heras‐Mendaza, Felipe, Serra‐Baldrich, Ester, Zaragoza‐Ninet, Violeta, Hervella‐Garces, Marcos, Gatica‐Ortega, María Elena, García‐Doval, Ignacio, Descalzo, Miguel Ángel, Borrego, Leopoldo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 577
container_issue 5
container_start_page 572
container_title Contact dermatitis
container_volume 85
creator Mercader‐García, Pedro
Pastor‐Nieto, María Antonia
Gonzalez‐Perez, Ricardo
Cordoba‐Guijarro, Susana
Gimenez‐Arnau, Ana María
Ruiz‐Gonzalez, Inmaculada
Mora‐Fernández, Verónica
Miquel, Javier
Silvestre‐Salvador, Juan Francisco
Ortiz‐Frutos, Francisco Javier
Sanz‐Sanchez, Tatiana
Rodriguez‐Serna, Mercedes
Perez‐Feal, Patricia
Sánchez‐Pérez, Javier
Heras‐Mendaza, Felipe
Serra‐Baldrich, Ester
Zaragoza‐Ninet, Violeta
Hervella‐Garces, Marcos
Gatica‐Ortega, María Elena
García‐Doval, Ignacio
Descalzo, Miguel Ángel
Borrego, Leopoldo
description Background Methyldibromo glutaronitrile (MDBGN) was one of the most frequent and relevant allergens found in patch testing at the beginning of this century. In 2008, this preservative was banned from cosmetics in Europe and ever since the prevalence of contact allergy to MDBGN has progressively decreased. Despite that gradual decline, MDBGN is still patch‐tested in most baseline series. This study assessed the frequency of MDBGN sensitization, epidemiological characteristics of allergic patients, and the relevance of positive patch tests in a nationwide Spanish registry (REIDAC). Patients and methods We evaluated consecutively patch‐tested patients in all participating centres. Using these data, we calculated the proportion of patients with positive patch tests to MDBGN from June 2018 to June 2020 and evaluated the relevance of the positive patch tests. Results One hundred and fourteen out of 5072 (2.24 %) tested patients were sensitized to MDBGN. Clinical current relevance was confirmed in only one case. Conclusion Although the frequency of contact allergy to MDBGN remains high, no clinical significance was found in most of these patients (5072 tests needed to obtain one relevant positive result). The clinical usefulness of this allergen seems weak and its continued inclusion in the European baseline series is questionable.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cod.13837
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503676281</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2503676281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-68b7f2fa8843d8d47851540e15ef4fa41fd76be53dab0163907210a29de1ae793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1qGzEURkVoSdy0i7xAEHTTLiaRRqORvArGcdtAINC060EzuhMraCRHPwTvSp-gz9gnqRK7WRSqzQVxONzvfgidUHJGyzsfvD6jTDJxgGa0JaQinLWv0IxQwisqBTtCb2K8J4S2TS0P0RFjouGU1zP083bts9V4grTeWm364CeP72xOKnhnUjAW8OBdMi4DTh73gHMEjY3DaQ14lYPfgHK4VxGscYBvIRiIF3iBv66uLhdL7FQy3imLh-Bj_P3jV4Rh_xNT1tu36PWobIR3-3mMvn9afVt-qa5vPl8tF9fVwKQUVSt7MdajkrJhWupGyJKgIUA5jM2oGjpq0fbAmVZ9CcrmRNSUqHqugSoQc3aMPuy8m-AfMsTUTSYOYK1y4HPsak5YK9pa0oK-_we99zmUjZ8oyRjjLW8K9XFHPQcLMHabYCYVth0l3VMxXSmmey6msKd7Y-4n0C_k3yYKcL4DHsvFt_83dcuby53yD0ccmLU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2583335654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Should methyldibromo glutaronitrile continue to be used in the European baseline Series? A REIDAC national cross‐sectional study</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Mercader‐García, Pedro ; Pastor‐Nieto, María Antonia ; Gonzalez‐Perez, Ricardo ; Cordoba‐Guijarro, Susana ; Gimenez‐Arnau, Ana María ; Ruiz‐Gonzalez, Inmaculada ; Mora‐Fernández, Verónica ; Miquel, Javier ; Silvestre‐Salvador, Juan Francisco ; Ortiz‐Frutos, Francisco Javier ; Sanz‐Sanchez, Tatiana ; Rodriguez‐Serna, Mercedes ; Perez‐Feal, Patricia ; Sánchez‐Pérez, Javier ; Heras‐Mendaza, Felipe ; Serra‐Baldrich, Ester ; Zaragoza‐Ninet, Violeta ; Hervella‐Garces, Marcos ; Gatica‐Ortega, María Elena ; García‐Doval, Ignacio ; Descalzo, Miguel Ángel ; Borrego, Leopoldo</creator><creatorcontrib>Mercader‐García, Pedro ; Pastor‐Nieto, María Antonia ; Gonzalez‐Perez, Ricardo ; Cordoba‐Guijarro, Susana ; Gimenez‐Arnau, Ana María ; Ruiz‐Gonzalez, Inmaculada ; Mora‐Fernández, Verónica ; Miquel, Javier ; Silvestre‐Salvador, Juan Francisco ; Ortiz‐Frutos, Francisco Javier ; Sanz‐Sanchez, Tatiana ; Rodriguez‐Serna, Mercedes ; Perez‐Feal, Patricia ; Sánchez‐Pérez, Javier ; Heras‐Mendaza, Felipe ; Serra‐Baldrich, Ester ; Zaragoza‐Ninet, Violeta ; Hervella‐Garces, Marcos ; Gatica‐Ortega, María Elena ; García‐Doval, Ignacio ; Descalzo, Miguel Ángel ; Borrego, Leopoldo ; REIDAC group ; the REIDAC group</creatorcontrib><description>Background Methyldibromo glutaronitrile (MDBGN) was one of the most frequent and relevant allergens found in patch testing at the beginning of this century. In 2008, this preservative was banned from cosmetics in Europe and ever since the prevalence of contact allergy to MDBGN has progressively decreased. Despite that gradual decline, MDBGN is still patch‐tested in most baseline series. This study assessed the frequency of MDBGN sensitization, epidemiological characteristics of allergic patients, and the relevance of positive patch tests in a nationwide Spanish registry (REIDAC). Patients and methods We evaluated consecutively patch‐tested patients in all participating centres. Using these data, we calculated the proportion of patients with positive patch tests to MDBGN from June 2018 to June 2020 and evaluated the relevance of the positive patch tests. Results One hundred and fourteen out of 5072 (2.24 %) tested patients were sensitized to MDBGN. Clinical current relevance was confirmed in only one case. Conclusion Although the frequency of contact allergy to MDBGN remains high, no clinical significance was found in most of these patients (5072 tests needed to obtain one relevant positive result). The clinical usefulness of this allergen seems weak and its continued inclusion in the European baseline series is questionable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0105-1873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cod.13837</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33745152</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Allergens ; allergic contact dermatitis ; Allergies ; clinical relevance ; Cosmetics ; Cosmetics - adverse effects ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; cross‐sectional study ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology ; Eczema ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; methyldibromo glutaronitrile ; Middle Aged ; Nitriles - adverse effects ; patch tests ; Patch Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Patients ; Preservatives ; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Contact dermatitis, 2021-11, Vol.85 (5), p.572-577</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-68b7f2fa8843d8d47851540e15ef4fa41fd76be53dab0163907210a29de1ae793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-68b7f2fa8843d8d47851540e15ef4fa41fd76be53dab0163907210a29de1ae793</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1809-4821 ; 0000-0002-8532-6338 ; 0000-0002-5016-173X ; 0000-0002-2262-7547 ; 0000-0002-0199-2756 ; 0000-0002-6881-5260 ; 0000-0001-5238-215X ; 0000-0002-3906-5026 ; 0000-0003-1240-1015 ; 0000-0002-2690-3668 ; 0000-0002-8203-5834 ; 0000-0002-5796-7680 ; 0000-0001-5434-7753 ; 0000-0001-7603-0300 ; 0000-0001-8382-5419 ; 0000-0002-5101-466X ; 0000-0002-8309-9725 ; 0000-0003-0016-9781 ; 0000-0001-5238-9562 ; 0000-0002-0635-0971</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcod.13837$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcod.13837$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33745152$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mercader‐García, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastor‐Nieto, María Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez‐Perez, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordoba‐Guijarro, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gimenez‐Arnau, Ana María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz‐Gonzalez, Inmaculada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mora‐Fernández, Verónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miquel, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvestre‐Salvador, Juan Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz‐Frutos, Francisco Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz‐Sanchez, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez‐Serna, Mercedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez‐Feal, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez‐Pérez, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heras‐Mendaza, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serra‐Baldrich, Ester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaragoza‐Ninet, Violeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hervella‐Garces, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatica‐Ortega, María Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Doval, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Descalzo, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borrego, Leopoldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REIDAC group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the REIDAC group</creatorcontrib><title>Should methyldibromo glutaronitrile continue to be used in the European baseline Series? A REIDAC national cross‐sectional study</title><title>Contact dermatitis</title><addtitle>Contact Dermatitis</addtitle><description>Background Methyldibromo glutaronitrile (MDBGN) was one of the most frequent and relevant allergens found in patch testing at the beginning of this century. In 2008, this preservative was banned from cosmetics in Europe and ever since the prevalence of contact allergy to MDBGN has progressively decreased. Despite that gradual decline, MDBGN is still patch‐tested in most baseline series. This study assessed the frequency of MDBGN sensitization, epidemiological characteristics of allergic patients, and the relevance of positive patch tests in a nationwide Spanish registry (REIDAC). Patients and methods We evaluated consecutively patch‐tested patients in all participating centres. Using these data, we calculated the proportion of patients with positive patch tests to MDBGN from June 2018 to June 2020 and evaluated the relevance of the positive patch tests. Results One hundred and fourteen out of 5072 (2.24 %) tested patients were sensitized to MDBGN. Clinical current relevance was confirmed in only one case. Conclusion Although the frequency of contact allergy to MDBGN remains high, no clinical significance was found in most of these patients (5072 tests needed to obtain one relevant positive result). The clinical usefulness of this allergen seems weak and its continued inclusion in the European baseline series is questionable.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Allergens</subject><subject>allergic contact dermatitis</subject><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>clinical relevance</subject><subject>Cosmetics</subject><subject>Cosmetics - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>cross‐sectional study</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology</subject><subject>Eczema</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>methyldibromo glutaronitrile</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nitriles - adverse effects</subject><subject>patch tests</subject><subject>Patch Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Preservatives</subject><subject>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - adverse effects</subject><issn>0105-1873</issn><issn>1600-0536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1qGzEURkVoSdy0i7xAEHTTLiaRRqORvArGcdtAINC060EzuhMraCRHPwTvSp-gz9gnqRK7WRSqzQVxONzvfgidUHJGyzsfvD6jTDJxgGa0JaQinLWv0IxQwisqBTtCb2K8J4S2TS0P0RFjouGU1zP083bts9V4grTeWm364CeP72xOKnhnUjAW8OBdMi4DTh73gHMEjY3DaQ14lYPfgHK4VxGscYBvIRiIF3iBv66uLhdL7FQy3imLh-Bj_P3jV4Rh_xNT1tu36PWobIR3-3mMvn9afVt-qa5vPl8tF9fVwKQUVSt7MdajkrJhWupGyJKgIUA5jM2oGjpq0fbAmVZ9CcrmRNSUqHqugSoQc3aMPuy8m-AfMsTUTSYOYK1y4HPsak5YK9pa0oK-_we99zmUjZ8oyRjjLW8K9XFHPQcLMHabYCYVth0l3VMxXSmmey6msKd7Y-4n0C_k3yYKcL4DHsvFt_83dcuby53yD0ccmLU</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Mercader‐García, Pedro</creator><creator>Pastor‐Nieto, María Antonia</creator><creator>Gonzalez‐Perez, Ricardo</creator><creator>Cordoba‐Guijarro, Susana</creator><creator>Gimenez‐Arnau, Ana María</creator><creator>Ruiz‐Gonzalez, Inmaculada</creator><creator>Mora‐Fernández, Verónica</creator><creator>Miquel, Javier</creator><creator>Silvestre‐Salvador, Juan Francisco</creator><creator>Ortiz‐Frutos, Francisco Javier</creator><creator>Sanz‐Sanchez, Tatiana</creator><creator>Rodriguez‐Serna, Mercedes</creator><creator>Perez‐Feal, Patricia</creator><creator>Sánchez‐Pérez, Javier</creator><creator>Heras‐Mendaza, Felipe</creator><creator>Serra‐Baldrich, Ester</creator><creator>Zaragoza‐Ninet, Violeta</creator><creator>Hervella‐Garces, Marcos</creator><creator>Gatica‐Ortega, María Elena</creator><creator>García‐Doval, Ignacio</creator><creator>Descalzo, Miguel Ángel</creator><creator>Borrego, Leopoldo</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1809-4821</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8532-6338</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5016-173X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2262-7547</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0199-2756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6881-5260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5238-215X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3906-5026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1240-1015</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2690-3668</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-5834</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5796-7680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5434-7753</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7603-0300</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8382-5419</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5101-466X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8309-9725</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0016-9781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5238-9562</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-0971</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Should methyldibromo glutaronitrile continue to be used in the European baseline Series? A REIDAC national cross‐sectional study</title><author>Mercader‐García, Pedro ; Pastor‐Nieto, María Antonia ; Gonzalez‐Perez, Ricardo ; Cordoba‐Guijarro, Susana ; Gimenez‐Arnau, Ana María ; Ruiz‐Gonzalez, Inmaculada ; Mora‐Fernández, Verónica ; Miquel, Javier ; Silvestre‐Salvador, Juan Francisco ; Ortiz‐Frutos, Francisco Javier ; Sanz‐Sanchez, Tatiana ; Rodriguez‐Serna, Mercedes ; Perez‐Feal, Patricia ; Sánchez‐Pérez, Javier ; Heras‐Mendaza, Felipe ; Serra‐Baldrich, Ester ; Zaragoza‐Ninet, Violeta ; Hervella‐Garces, Marcos ; Gatica‐Ortega, María Elena ; García‐Doval, Ignacio ; Descalzo, Miguel Ángel ; Borrego, Leopoldo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-68b7f2fa8843d8d47851540e15ef4fa41fd76be53dab0163907210a29de1ae793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Allergens</topic><topic>allergic contact dermatitis</topic><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>clinical relevance</topic><topic>Cosmetics</topic><topic>Cosmetics - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>cross‐sectional study</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology</topic><topic>Eczema</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>methyldibromo glutaronitrile</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nitriles - adverse effects</topic><topic>patch tests</topic><topic>Patch Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Preservatives</topic><topic>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mercader‐García, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastor‐Nieto, María Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez‐Perez, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordoba‐Guijarro, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gimenez‐Arnau, Ana María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz‐Gonzalez, Inmaculada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mora‐Fernández, Verónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miquel, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvestre‐Salvador, Juan Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz‐Frutos, Francisco Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz‐Sanchez, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez‐Serna, Mercedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez‐Feal, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez‐Pérez, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heras‐Mendaza, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serra‐Baldrich, Ester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaragoza‐Ninet, Violeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hervella‐Garces, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatica‐Ortega, María Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Doval, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Descalzo, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borrego, Leopoldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REIDAC group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the REIDAC group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contact dermatitis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mercader‐García, Pedro</au><au>Pastor‐Nieto, María Antonia</au><au>Gonzalez‐Perez, Ricardo</au><au>Cordoba‐Guijarro, Susana</au><au>Gimenez‐Arnau, Ana María</au><au>Ruiz‐Gonzalez, Inmaculada</au><au>Mora‐Fernández, Verónica</au><au>Miquel, Javier</au><au>Silvestre‐Salvador, Juan Francisco</au><au>Ortiz‐Frutos, Francisco Javier</au><au>Sanz‐Sanchez, Tatiana</au><au>Rodriguez‐Serna, Mercedes</au><au>Perez‐Feal, Patricia</au><au>Sánchez‐Pérez, Javier</au><au>Heras‐Mendaza, Felipe</au><au>Serra‐Baldrich, Ester</au><au>Zaragoza‐Ninet, Violeta</au><au>Hervella‐Garces, Marcos</au><au>Gatica‐Ortega, María Elena</au><au>García‐Doval, Ignacio</au><au>Descalzo, Miguel Ángel</au><au>Borrego, Leopoldo</au><aucorp>REIDAC group</aucorp><aucorp>the REIDAC group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Should methyldibromo glutaronitrile continue to be used in the European baseline Series? A REIDAC national cross‐sectional study</atitle><jtitle>Contact dermatitis</jtitle><addtitle>Contact Dermatitis</addtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>572</spage><epage>577</epage><pages>572-577</pages><issn>0105-1873</issn><eissn>1600-0536</eissn><abstract>Background Methyldibromo glutaronitrile (MDBGN) was one of the most frequent and relevant allergens found in patch testing at the beginning of this century. In 2008, this preservative was banned from cosmetics in Europe and ever since the prevalence of contact allergy to MDBGN has progressively decreased. Despite that gradual decline, MDBGN is still patch‐tested in most baseline series. This study assessed the frequency of MDBGN sensitization, epidemiological characteristics of allergic patients, and the relevance of positive patch tests in a nationwide Spanish registry (REIDAC). Patients and methods We evaluated consecutively patch‐tested patients in all participating centres. Using these data, we calculated the proportion of patients with positive patch tests to MDBGN from June 2018 to June 2020 and evaluated the relevance of the positive patch tests. Results One hundred and fourteen out of 5072 (2.24 %) tested patients were sensitized to MDBGN. Clinical current relevance was confirmed in only one case. Conclusion Although the frequency of contact allergy to MDBGN remains high, no clinical significance was found in most of these patients (5072 tests needed to obtain one relevant positive result). The clinical usefulness of this allergen seems weak and its continued inclusion in the European baseline series is questionable.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33745152</pmid><doi>10.1111/cod.13837</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1809-4821</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8532-6338</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5016-173X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2262-7547</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0199-2756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6881-5260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5238-215X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3906-5026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1240-1015</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2690-3668</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-5834</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5796-7680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5434-7753</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7603-0300</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8382-5419</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5101-466X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8309-9725</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0016-9781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5238-9562</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-0971</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0105-1873
ispartof Contact dermatitis, 2021-11, Vol.85 (5), p.572-577
issn 0105-1873
1600-0536
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503676281
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Allergens
allergic contact dermatitis
Allergies
clinical relevance
Cosmetics
Cosmetics - adverse effects
Cross-Sectional Studies
cross‐sectional study
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology
Eczema
Epidemiology
Female
Humans
Male
methyldibromo glutaronitrile
Middle Aged
Nitriles - adverse effects
patch tests
Patch Tests - statistics & numerical data
Patients
Preservatives
Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - adverse effects
title Should methyldibromo glutaronitrile continue to be used in the European baseline Series? A REIDAC national cross‐sectional study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T11%3A32%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Should%20methyldibromo%20glutaronitrile%20continue%20to%20be%20used%20in%20the%20European%20baseline%20Series?%20A%20REIDAC%20national%20cross%E2%80%90sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=Contact%20dermatitis&rft.au=Mercader%E2%80%90Garc%C3%ADa,%20Pedro&rft.aucorp=REIDAC%20group&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=572&rft.epage=577&rft.pages=572-577&rft.issn=0105-1873&rft.eissn=1600-0536&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cod.13837&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2503676281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2583335654&rft_id=info:pmid/33745152&rfr_iscdi=true