Should methyldibromo glutaronitrile continue to be used in the European baseline Series? A REIDAC national cross‐sectional study

Background Methyldibromo glutaronitrile (MDBGN) was one of the most frequent and relevant allergens found in patch testing at the beginning of this century. In 2008, this preservative was banned from cosmetics in Europe and ever since the prevalence of contact allergy to MDBGN has progressively decr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contact dermatitis 2021-11, Vol.85 (5), p.572-577
Hauptverfasser: Mercader‐García, Pedro, Pastor‐Nieto, María Antonia, Gonzalez‐Perez, Ricardo, Cordoba‐Guijarro, Susana, Gimenez‐Arnau, Ana María, Ruiz‐Gonzalez, Inmaculada, Mora‐Fernández, Verónica, Miquel, Javier, Silvestre‐Salvador, Juan Francisco, Ortiz‐Frutos, Francisco Javier, Sanz‐Sanchez, Tatiana, Rodriguez‐Serna, Mercedes, Perez‐Feal, Patricia, Sánchez‐Pérez, Javier, Heras‐Mendaza, Felipe, Serra‐Baldrich, Ester, Zaragoza‐Ninet, Violeta, Hervella‐Garces, Marcos, Gatica‐Ortega, María Elena, García‐Doval, Ignacio, Descalzo, Miguel Ángel, Borrego, Leopoldo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Methyldibromo glutaronitrile (MDBGN) was one of the most frequent and relevant allergens found in patch testing at the beginning of this century. In 2008, this preservative was banned from cosmetics in Europe and ever since the prevalence of contact allergy to MDBGN has progressively decreased. Despite that gradual decline, MDBGN is still patch‐tested in most baseline series. This study assessed the frequency of MDBGN sensitization, epidemiological characteristics of allergic patients, and the relevance of positive patch tests in a nationwide Spanish registry (REIDAC). Patients and methods We evaluated consecutively patch‐tested patients in all participating centres. Using these data, we calculated the proportion of patients with positive patch tests to MDBGN from June 2018 to June 2020 and evaluated the relevance of the positive patch tests. Results One hundred and fourteen out of 5072 (2.24 %) tested patients were sensitized to MDBGN. Clinical current relevance was confirmed in only one case. Conclusion Although the frequency of contact allergy to MDBGN remains high, no clinical significance was found in most of these patients (5072 tests needed to obtain one relevant positive result). The clinical usefulness of this allergen seems weak and its continued inclusion in the European baseline series is questionable.
ISSN:0105-1873
1600-0536
DOI:10.1111/cod.13837