Cost analysis of a long‐term randomized controlled study in biliary duct‐to‐duct anastomotic stricture after liver transplantation
Summary Multiple plastic stent (MPS) for biliary anastomotic stricture (AS) after liver transplantation requires multiple procedures with consequent costs. To compare the success, adverse events and treatment‐related costs of fully covered self‐expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) versus MPS. Thirty liv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transplant international 2021-05, Vol.34 (5), p.825-834 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary
Multiple plastic stent (MPS) for biliary anastomotic stricture (AS) after liver transplantation requires multiple procedures with consequent costs. To compare the success, adverse events and treatment‐related costs of fully covered self‐expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) versus MPS. Thirty liver transplant (LT) patients with clinically relevant naïve AS were prospectively randomized to FCSEMS or MPS, with stent numbers increased at 3‐month intervals. Treatment costs per patient were calculated for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (including all devices and stents) and overall hospital stay. Radiological success was achieved in 73% of FCSEMS (median indwelling period of 6 mos) and 93% of MPS patients (P = NS) (median period of 11 mos). AS recurrence occurred in 36% of FCSEMS and 7% of MPS patients (P = NS), and AS re‐treatment was needed in 53% and 13% (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0934-0874 1432-2277 |
DOI: | 10.1111/tri.13867 |