Novel flat-panel cone-beam CT compared to multi-detector CT for assessment of acute ischemic stroke: A prospective study
•Cone-beam CT (CBCT) can be performed in the angiosuite for the assessment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients.•Image quality (IQ) developments improved assessment of brain parenchyma that was not achievable with older CBCT technology.•Continued IQ improvements may allow for the eventual primary...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 2021-05, Vol.138, p.109645-109645, Article 109645 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Cone-beam CT (CBCT) can be performed in the angiosuite for the assessment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients.•Image quality (IQ) developments improved assessment of brain parenchyma that was not achievable with older CBCT technology.•Continued IQ improvements may allow for the eventual primary use of CBCT for the evaluation of selected AIS patients.
Cone beam CT (CBCT) imaging assessment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) in the angiosuite may improve stroke workflow and decrease time to recanalization. In order for this workflow to gain widespread acceptance, current CBCT imaging needs further development to improve image quality. Our study aimed to compare the image quality of a new CBCT protocol performed directly in the angiosuite with imaging from multidetector CT as a gold standard.
AIS patients with an LVO who were candidates for endovascular treatment were prospectively included in this study. Following conventional multidetector CT (MDCT), patients underwent unenhanced cone beam CT (XperCT, Philips) imaging in the angiosuite, using two different protocols: a standard 20.8 s XperCT and/or an improved 10.4 s XperCT protocol. Images were evaluated using both qualitative and quantitative methods.
We included 65 patients in the study. Patients received CBCT imaging prior to endovascular treatment; 18 patients were assessed with a standard 20.8 s protocol scans and 47 with a newer 10.4 s scan. The quantitative analysis showed that the mean contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was significantly higher for the newer 10.4 s protocol compared with the 20.8 s protocol (2.08 +/- 0.64 vs. 1.15 +/- 0.27, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109645 |