Comparison of a new rapid method for determination of serum anti-adalimumab and anti-infliximab antibodies with two established ELISA kits

•Immunogenicity of infliximab and adalimumab is a problem causing loss of response.•Monitoring of anti-drug antibodies is recommended in clinical guidelines.•Quantitative point-of-care tests for anti-drug antibodies determination are being developed.•We performed the first comparison between a quant...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis 2021-05, Vol.198, p.114003-114003, Article 114003
Hauptverfasser: Laserna-Mendieta, Emilio J., Salvador-Martín, Sara, Marín-Jiménez, Ignacio, Menchén, Luis A., López-Cauce, Beatriz, López-Fernández, Luis A., Lucendo, Alfredo J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Immunogenicity of infliximab and adalimumab is a problem causing loss of response.•Monitoring of anti-drug antibodies is recommended in clinical guidelines.•Quantitative point-of-care tests for anti-drug antibodies determination are being developed.•We performed the first comparison between a quantitative rapid method and ELISA kits.•Different clinical decisions could be chosen depending on the method used. Adalimumab (ADL), infliximab (IFX) and their biosimilars are widely used biological drugs. Some patients, however, generate neutralizing antibodies that hamper the effectiveness of these drugs. Evidence shows therapeutic drug monitoring of serum levels ADL/IFX and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) is useful to improve treatment effectiveness. We evaluated a new rapid quantitative method, Quantum Blue (QB), for determining serum anti-ADL and anti-IFX antibodies (Research Use Only labelling) by comparing it with two established ELISA kits, Promonitor (PM) and Lisa-Tracker (LT). Eighty samples (40 for each drug type) were analysed. Percentage of agreement and kappa statistic were used to compare positive/negative ADA results. Clinical implications for drug treatment in the patients with discordant results were evaluated. The Chi-square test was used to analyze differences for ADA detection in patients with disease flare and without concomitant immunosuppressant treatment. Agreement exceeded 80 % among anti-ADL methods. Although LT ELISA showed a lower capacity in detecting anti-ADL antibodies, discrepancies were found for levels close to the cut-off concentration, thus having minimal impact on clinical decisions. Conversely, QB anti-IFX displayed low agreement with PM and LT ELISA kits (67.5 % and 50 %, respectively), and was unable to detect high levels of antibodies, therefore having major clinical implications. Agreement between PM and LT ELISA anti-IFX kits was 82.5 % with all discordant results being undetected for PM and slightly positive for LT. QB anti-ADL shows similar performance to ELISA kits while QB anti-IFX needs further improvements to achieve reliable antibody detection.
ISSN:0731-7085
1873-264X
DOI:10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114003