Single Institution Experience of Proton and Photon-based Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non–small-cell lung cancer remains controversial with studies showing no overall survival (OS) benefit in the setting of excessive cardiopulmonary toxicity. Proton beam therapy (PBT) can potentially reduce toxicity with improved organ-at-risk sparing. We ev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical lung cancer 2021-09, Vol.22 (5), p.e745-e755
Hauptverfasser: Boyce-Fappiano, David, Nguyen, Quynh-Nhu, Chapman, Bhavana V., Allen, Pamela K., Gjyshi, Olsi, Pezzi, Todd A., De, Brian, Gomez, Daniel, Lin, Steven H., Chang, Joe Y., Liao, Zhongxing, Lee, Percy, Gandhi, Saumil J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e755
container_issue 5
container_start_page e745
container_title Clinical lung cancer
container_volume 22
creator Boyce-Fappiano, David
Nguyen, Quynh-Nhu
Chapman, Bhavana V.
Allen, Pamela K.
Gjyshi, Olsi
Pezzi, Todd A.
De, Brian
Gomez, Daniel
Lin, Steven H.
Chang, Joe Y.
Liao, Zhongxing
Lee, Percy
Gandhi, Saumil J.
description Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non–small-cell lung cancer remains controversial with studies showing no overall survival (OS) benefit in the setting of excessive cardiopulmonary toxicity. Proton beam therapy (PBT) can potentially reduce toxicity with improved organ-at-risk sparing. We evaluated outcomes of PORT patients treated with PBT and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This is a retrospective review of 136 PORT patients (61 PBT, 75 IMRT) treated from 2003 to 2016. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess oncologic outcomes. A Cox regression was conducted to identify associated factors. Total toxicity burden (TTB) was defined as grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis, cardiac, or esophageal toxicity. Median OS was 76 and 46 months for PBT and IMRT with corresponding 1- and 5-year OS of 85.3%, 50.9% and 89.3%, 37.2% (P = .38), respectively. V30 Gy heart (odds ratio [OR], 144.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.91-7214; P = .013) and V5 Gy lung (OR, 15.8; 95% CI, 1.22-202.7; P = .03) were predictive of OS. Organ-at-risk sparing was improved with PBT versus IMRT; mean heart 2.0 versus 7.4 Gy (P < .01), V30 Gy heart 2.6% versus 10.7% (P < .01), mean lung 7.9 versus 10.4 Gy (P = .042), V5 Gy lung 23.4% versus 42.1% (P < .01), and V10 Gy lung 20.4% versus 29.6% (P < .01). TTB was reduced with PBT (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.83; P = .017). Rates of cardiac toxicity were 14.7% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .09). Rates of ≥ grade 2 pneumonitis were 17.0% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .104). PBT improved cardiac and lung sparing and reduced toxicity compared with IMRT. Considering the impact of cardiopulmonary toxicity on PORT outcomes, PBT warrants prospective evaluation. Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non–small-cell lung cancer remains controversial and is associated with elevated cardiopulmonary toxicity. Recent advances in PORT techniques including proton beam therapy (PBT) may improve toxicity. We evaluated 136 patients treated with PORT at our institution. PBT resulted in improved heart and lung sparing with reduced toxicity rates. Proton-based PORT should be evaluated prospectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.02.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501268163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1525730421000255</els_id><sourcerecordid>2501268163</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8762d43ce48963bd36d9f3adc11ad64b70ce97e8731429da6569f2946091f58a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAURS0EoqXwAyyQl2wSnu3EiSU2aFSg0ggqKGvLY7-0HmXiwXYqZsc_9A_7JTidwpKVn5_OvbIPIa8Z1AyYfLet7TjamgNnNfAagD8hp0yJvgKp4GmZW95WnYDmhLxIaVsAKRh_Tk6E6KADEKfk8N1P1yPSiylln-fsw0TPf-0xepws0jDQyxhyWZrJ0cubZaw2JmG5hJRDAU32t0i_GefNQ_rqpuz2BzqESL-E6f73XdqZcawsjiNdz9M1XZlSHV-SZ4MZE756PM_Ij4_nV6vP1frrp4vVh3VlG4Bc9Z3krhEWm15JsXFCOjUI4yxjxslm04FF1WHfCdZw5YxspRq4aiQoNrS9EWfk7bF3H8PPGVPWO5-Wx5gJw5w0b4Fx2TMpCsqPqI0hpYiD3ke_M_GgGehFud7qRblelGvguhgtoTeP_fNmh-5f5K_jArw_Alh-eesx6mQf7Dof0Wbtgv9f_x8hE5P9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501268163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single Institution Experience of Proton and Photon-based Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Non–small-cell Lung Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Boyce-Fappiano, David ; Nguyen, Quynh-Nhu ; Chapman, Bhavana V. ; Allen, Pamela K. ; Gjyshi, Olsi ; Pezzi, Todd A. ; De, Brian ; Gomez, Daniel ; Lin, Steven H. ; Chang, Joe Y. ; Liao, Zhongxing ; Lee, Percy ; Gandhi, Saumil J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boyce-Fappiano, David ; Nguyen, Quynh-Nhu ; Chapman, Bhavana V. ; Allen, Pamela K. ; Gjyshi, Olsi ; Pezzi, Todd A. ; De, Brian ; Gomez, Daniel ; Lin, Steven H. ; Chang, Joe Y. ; Liao, Zhongxing ; Lee, Percy ; Gandhi, Saumil J.</creatorcontrib><description>Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non–small-cell lung cancer remains controversial with studies showing no overall survival (OS) benefit in the setting of excessive cardiopulmonary toxicity. Proton beam therapy (PBT) can potentially reduce toxicity with improved organ-at-risk sparing. We evaluated outcomes of PORT patients treated with PBT and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This is a retrospective review of 136 PORT patients (61 PBT, 75 IMRT) treated from 2003 to 2016. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess oncologic outcomes. A Cox regression was conducted to identify associated factors. Total toxicity burden (TTB) was defined as grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis, cardiac, or esophageal toxicity. Median OS was 76 and 46 months for PBT and IMRT with corresponding 1- and 5-year OS of 85.3%, 50.9% and 89.3%, 37.2% (P = .38), respectively. V30 Gy heart (odds ratio [OR], 144.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.91-7214; P = .013) and V5 Gy lung (OR, 15.8; 95% CI, 1.22-202.7; P = .03) were predictive of OS. Organ-at-risk sparing was improved with PBT versus IMRT; mean heart 2.0 versus 7.4 Gy (P &lt; .01), V30 Gy heart 2.6% versus 10.7% (P &lt; .01), mean lung 7.9 versus 10.4 Gy (P = .042), V5 Gy lung 23.4% versus 42.1% (P &lt; .01), and V10 Gy lung 20.4% versus 29.6% (P &lt; .01). TTB was reduced with PBT (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.83; P = .017). Rates of cardiac toxicity were 14.7% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .09). Rates of ≥ grade 2 pneumonitis were 17.0% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .104). PBT improved cardiac and lung sparing and reduced toxicity compared with IMRT. Considering the impact of cardiopulmonary toxicity on PORT outcomes, PBT warrants prospective evaluation. Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non–small-cell lung cancer remains controversial and is associated with elevated cardiopulmonary toxicity. Recent advances in PORT techniques including proton beam therapy (PBT) may improve toxicity. We evaluated 136 patients treated with PORT at our institution. PBT resulted in improved heart and lung sparing with reduced toxicity rates. Proton-based PORT should be evaluated prospectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-7304</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-0690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.02.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33707003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy ; Lung Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; PORT ; Postoperative Care ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Proton Therapy ; Radiation ; Retrospective Studies ; Toxicity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Clinical lung cancer, 2021-09, Vol.22 (5), p.e745-e755</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8762d43ce48963bd36d9f3adc11ad64b70ce97e8731429da6569f2946091f58a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8762d43ce48963bd36d9f3adc11ad64b70ce97e8731429da6569f2946091f58a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6044-758X ; 0000-0002-2926-3432 ; 0000-0002-0814-2244 ; 0000-0003-4135-8271</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730421000255$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33707003$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boyce-Fappiano, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Quynh-Nhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Bhavana V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Pamela K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gjyshi, Olsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pezzi, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Steven H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Joe Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Zhongxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Percy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Saumil J.</creatorcontrib><title>Single Institution Experience of Proton and Photon-based Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Non–small-cell Lung Cancer</title><title>Clinical lung cancer</title><addtitle>Clin Lung Cancer</addtitle><description>Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non–small-cell lung cancer remains controversial with studies showing no overall survival (OS) benefit in the setting of excessive cardiopulmonary toxicity. Proton beam therapy (PBT) can potentially reduce toxicity with improved organ-at-risk sparing. We evaluated outcomes of PORT patients treated with PBT and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This is a retrospective review of 136 PORT patients (61 PBT, 75 IMRT) treated from 2003 to 2016. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess oncologic outcomes. A Cox regression was conducted to identify associated factors. Total toxicity burden (TTB) was defined as grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis, cardiac, or esophageal toxicity. Median OS was 76 and 46 months for PBT and IMRT with corresponding 1- and 5-year OS of 85.3%, 50.9% and 89.3%, 37.2% (P = .38), respectively. V30 Gy heart (odds ratio [OR], 144.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.91-7214; P = .013) and V5 Gy lung (OR, 15.8; 95% CI, 1.22-202.7; P = .03) were predictive of OS. Organ-at-risk sparing was improved with PBT versus IMRT; mean heart 2.0 versus 7.4 Gy (P &lt; .01), V30 Gy heart 2.6% versus 10.7% (P &lt; .01), mean lung 7.9 versus 10.4 Gy (P = .042), V5 Gy lung 23.4% versus 42.1% (P &lt; .01), and V10 Gy lung 20.4% versus 29.6% (P &lt; .01). TTB was reduced with PBT (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.83; P = .017). Rates of cardiac toxicity were 14.7% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .09). Rates of ≥ grade 2 pneumonitis were 17.0% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .104). PBT improved cardiac and lung sparing and reduced toxicity compared with IMRT. Considering the impact of cardiopulmonary toxicity on PORT outcomes, PBT warrants prospective evaluation. Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non–small-cell lung cancer remains controversial and is associated with elevated cardiopulmonary toxicity. Recent advances in PORT techniques including proton beam therapy (PBT) may improve toxicity. We evaluated 136 patients treated with PORT at our institution. PBT resulted in improved heart and lung sparing with reduced toxicity rates. Proton-based PORT should be evaluated prospectively.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>PORT</subject><subject>Postoperative Care</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Proton Therapy</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1525-7304</issn><issn>1938-0690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAURS0EoqXwAyyQl2wSnu3EiSU2aFSg0ggqKGvLY7-0HmXiwXYqZsc_9A_7JTidwpKVn5_OvbIPIa8Z1AyYfLet7TjamgNnNfAagD8hp0yJvgKp4GmZW95WnYDmhLxIaVsAKRh_Tk6E6KADEKfk8N1P1yPSiylln-fsw0TPf-0xepws0jDQyxhyWZrJ0cubZaw2JmG5hJRDAU32t0i_GefNQ_rqpuz2BzqESL-E6f73XdqZcawsjiNdz9M1XZlSHV-SZ4MZE756PM_Ij4_nV6vP1frrp4vVh3VlG4Bc9Z3krhEWm15JsXFCOjUI4yxjxslm04FF1WHfCdZw5YxspRq4aiQoNrS9EWfk7bF3H8PPGVPWO5-Wx5gJw5w0b4Fx2TMpCsqPqI0hpYiD3ke_M_GgGehFud7qRblelGvguhgtoTeP_fNmh-5f5K_jArw_Alh-eesx6mQf7Dof0Wbtgv9f_x8hE5P9</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Boyce-Fappiano, David</creator><creator>Nguyen, Quynh-Nhu</creator><creator>Chapman, Bhavana V.</creator><creator>Allen, Pamela K.</creator><creator>Gjyshi, Olsi</creator><creator>Pezzi, Todd A.</creator><creator>De, Brian</creator><creator>Gomez, Daniel</creator><creator>Lin, Steven H.</creator><creator>Chang, Joe Y.</creator><creator>Liao, Zhongxing</creator><creator>Lee, Percy</creator><creator>Gandhi, Saumil J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6044-758X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2926-3432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0814-2244</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4135-8271</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Single Institution Experience of Proton and Photon-based Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Non–small-cell Lung Cancer</title><author>Boyce-Fappiano, David ; Nguyen, Quynh-Nhu ; Chapman, Bhavana V. ; Allen, Pamela K. ; Gjyshi, Olsi ; Pezzi, Todd A. ; De, Brian ; Gomez, Daniel ; Lin, Steven H. ; Chang, Joe Y. ; Liao, Zhongxing ; Lee, Percy ; Gandhi, Saumil J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8762d43ce48963bd36d9f3adc11ad64b70ce97e8731429da6569f2946091f58a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>PORT</topic><topic>Postoperative Care</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Proton Therapy</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boyce-Fappiano, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Quynh-Nhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Bhavana V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Pamela K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gjyshi, Olsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pezzi, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Steven H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Joe Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Zhongxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Percy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Saumil J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical lung cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boyce-Fappiano, David</au><au>Nguyen, Quynh-Nhu</au><au>Chapman, Bhavana V.</au><au>Allen, Pamela K.</au><au>Gjyshi, Olsi</au><au>Pezzi, Todd A.</au><au>De, Brian</au><au>Gomez, Daniel</au><au>Lin, Steven H.</au><au>Chang, Joe Y.</au><au>Liao, Zhongxing</au><au>Lee, Percy</au><au>Gandhi, Saumil J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single Institution Experience of Proton and Photon-based Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Non–small-cell Lung Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Clinical lung cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Lung Cancer</addtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e745</spage><epage>e755</epage><pages>e745-e755</pages><issn>1525-7304</issn><eissn>1938-0690</eissn><abstract>Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non–small-cell lung cancer remains controversial with studies showing no overall survival (OS) benefit in the setting of excessive cardiopulmonary toxicity. Proton beam therapy (PBT) can potentially reduce toxicity with improved organ-at-risk sparing. We evaluated outcomes of PORT patients treated with PBT and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This is a retrospective review of 136 PORT patients (61 PBT, 75 IMRT) treated from 2003 to 2016. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess oncologic outcomes. A Cox regression was conducted to identify associated factors. Total toxicity burden (TTB) was defined as grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis, cardiac, or esophageal toxicity. Median OS was 76 and 46 months for PBT and IMRT with corresponding 1- and 5-year OS of 85.3%, 50.9% and 89.3%, 37.2% (P = .38), respectively. V30 Gy heart (odds ratio [OR], 144.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.91-7214; P = .013) and V5 Gy lung (OR, 15.8; 95% CI, 1.22-202.7; P = .03) were predictive of OS. Organ-at-risk sparing was improved with PBT versus IMRT; mean heart 2.0 versus 7.4 Gy (P &lt; .01), V30 Gy heart 2.6% versus 10.7% (P &lt; .01), mean lung 7.9 versus 10.4 Gy (P = .042), V5 Gy lung 23.4% versus 42.1% (P &lt; .01), and V10 Gy lung 20.4% versus 29.6% (P &lt; .01). TTB was reduced with PBT (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.83; P = .017). Rates of cardiac toxicity were 14.7% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .09). Rates of ≥ grade 2 pneumonitis were 17.0% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .104). PBT improved cardiac and lung sparing and reduced toxicity compared with IMRT. Considering the impact of cardiopulmonary toxicity on PORT outcomes, PBT warrants prospective evaluation. Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non–small-cell lung cancer remains controversial and is associated with elevated cardiopulmonary toxicity. Recent advances in PORT techniques including proton beam therapy (PBT) may improve toxicity. We evaluated 136 patients treated with PORT at our institution. PBT resulted in improved heart and lung sparing with reduced toxicity rates. Proton-based PORT should be evaluated prospectively.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33707003</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cllc.2021.02.002</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6044-758X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2926-3432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0814-2244</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4135-8271</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-7304
ispartof Clinical lung cancer, 2021-09, Vol.22 (5), p.e745-e755
issn 1525-7304
1938-0690
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501268163
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery
Female
Humans
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
Lung Neoplasms - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
PORT
Postoperative Care
Proportional Hazards Models
Proton Therapy
Radiation
Retrospective Studies
Toxicity
Young Adult
title Single Institution Experience of Proton and Photon-based Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Non–small-cell Lung Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A14%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single%20Institution%20Experience%20of%20Proton%20and%20Photon-based%20Postoperative%20Radiation%20Therapy%20for%20Non%E2%80%93small-cell%20Lung%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20lung%20cancer&rft.au=Boyce-Fappiano,%20David&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e745&rft.epage=e755&rft.pages=e745-e755&rft.issn=1525-7304&rft.eissn=1938-0690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cllc.2021.02.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2501268163%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501268163&rft_id=info:pmid/33707003&rft_els_id=S1525730421000255&rfr_iscdi=true