Single Institution Experience of Proton and Photon-based Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non–small-cell lung cancer remains controversial with studies showing no overall survival (OS) benefit in the setting of excessive cardiopulmonary toxicity. Proton beam therapy (PBT) can potentially reduce toxicity with improved organ-at-risk sparing. We ev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical lung cancer 2021-09, Vol.22 (5), p.e745-e755
Hauptverfasser: Boyce-Fappiano, David, Nguyen, Quynh-Nhu, Chapman, Bhavana V., Allen, Pamela K., Gjyshi, Olsi, Pezzi, Todd A., De, Brian, Gomez, Daniel, Lin, Steven H., Chang, Joe Y., Liao, Zhongxing, Lee, Percy, Gandhi, Saumil J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non–small-cell lung cancer remains controversial with studies showing no overall survival (OS) benefit in the setting of excessive cardiopulmonary toxicity. Proton beam therapy (PBT) can potentially reduce toxicity with improved organ-at-risk sparing. We evaluated outcomes of PORT patients treated with PBT and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This is a retrospective review of 136 PORT patients (61 PBT, 75 IMRT) treated from 2003 to 2016. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess oncologic outcomes. A Cox regression was conducted to identify associated factors. Total toxicity burden (TTB) was defined as grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis, cardiac, or esophageal toxicity. Median OS was 76 and 46 months for PBT and IMRT with corresponding 1- and 5-year OS of 85.3%, 50.9% and 89.3%, 37.2% (P = .38), respectively. V30 Gy heart (odds ratio [OR], 144.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.91-7214; P = .013) and V5 Gy lung (OR, 15.8; 95% CI, 1.22-202.7; P = .03) were predictive of OS. Organ-at-risk sparing was improved with PBT versus IMRT; mean heart 2.0 versus 7.4 Gy (P < .01), V30 Gy heart 2.6% versus 10.7% (P < .01), mean lung 7.9 versus 10.4 Gy (P = .042), V5 Gy lung 23.4% versus 42.1% (P < .01), and V10 Gy lung 20.4% versus 29.6% (P < .01). TTB was reduced with PBT (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.83; P = .017). Rates of cardiac toxicity were 14.7% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .09). Rates of ≥ grade 2 pneumonitis were 17.0% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .104). PBT improved cardiac and lung sparing and reduced toxicity compared with IMRT. Considering the impact of cardiopulmonary toxicity on PORT outcomes, PBT warrants prospective evaluation. Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non–small-cell lung cancer remains controversial and is associated with elevated cardiopulmonary toxicity. Recent advances in PORT techniques including proton beam therapy (PBT) may improve toxicity. We evaluated 136 patients treated with PORT at our institution. PBT resulted in improved heart and lung sparing with reduced toxicity rates. Proton-based PORT should be evaluated prospectively.
ISSN:1525-7304
1938-0690
DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2021.02.002