Recognition memory for human motor learning

Motor skill retention is typically measured by asking participants to reproduce previously learned movements from memory. The analog of this retention test (recall memory) in human verbal memory is known to underestimate how much learning is actually retained. Here we asked whether information about...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current biology 2021-04, Vol.31 (8), p.1678-1686.e3
Hauptverfasser: Kumar, Neeraj, van Vugt, Floris T., Ostry, David J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Motor skill retention is typically measured by asking participants to reproduce previously learned movements from memory. The analog of this retention test (recall memory) in human verbal memory is known to underestimate how much learning is actually retained. Here we asked whether information about previously learned movements, which can no longer be reproduced, is also retained. Following visuomotor adaptation, we used tests of recall that involved reproduction of previously learned movements and tests of recognition in which participants were asked whether a candidate limb displacement, produced by a robot arm held by the subject, corresponded to a movement direction that was experienced during active training. The main finding was that 24 h after training, estimates of recognition memory were about twice as accurate as those of recall memory. Thus, there is information about previously learned movements that is not retrieved using recall testing but can be accessed in tests of recognition. We conducted additional tests to assess whether, 24 h after learning, recall for previously learned movements could be improved by presenting passive movements as retrieval cues. These tests were conducted immediately prior to recall testing and involved the passive playback of a small number of movements, which were spread across the workspace and included both adapted and baseline movements, without being marked as such. This technique restored recall memory for movements to levels close to those of recognition memory performance. Thus, somatic information may enable retrieval of otherwise inaccessible motor memories. •Recognition memory for motor learning exceeds memory assessed using active movement•Retrieval cues in the form of passive movements restore motor memory•Encoding of human motor memory is at least in part somatic•Information about motor learning is retained but inaccessible using active movement Kumar et al. introduce a test of recognition memory for human motor learning. Participants hold a robot arm that replays candidate movements and are asked if they had produced this movement during training. Recognition tests are able to uncover substantial information regarding learned movements that is not evident with active movement testing.
ISSN:0960-9822
1879-0445
DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.097