Myocardial motion-corrected phase-sensitive inversion recovery late gadolinium enhancement in free breathing paediatric patients: a comparison with single-shot coherent gradient echo (“TrueFISP”) phase-sensitive inversion recovery

To investigate the value of motion-corrected (MOCO) phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) compared with single-shot balanced steady-state gradient echo (“TrueFISP”, Siemens) PSIR in free breathing paediatric patients. In this retrospective study, 238 paediatric...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical radiology 2021-06, Vol.76 (6), p.471.e17-471.e25
Hauptverfasser: Xie, L.J., Xu, R., Xu, Z.Y., Li, X.S., Zhou, X.Y., Bi, X.M., Mu, J.S., Fan, H.M., Xu, H.Y., Guo, Y.K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To investigate the value of motion-corrected (MOCO) phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) compared with single-shot balanced steady-state gradient echo (“TrueFISP”, Siemens) PSIR in free breathing paediatric patients. In this retrospective study, 238 paediatric patients underwent clinical contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). Both the single-shot TrueFISP PSIR and MOCO PSIR sequences were performed on each child. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Two radiologists rated the quality of the images on a scale of 1–5 (1 = poor, 5 = very good). Bland–Altman, linear regression, and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to compared the extent of LGE of the single-shot TrueFISP PSIR and MOCO PSIR. Imaging artefacts were described and compared. Children ranged in age from 60 days to 17 years with an average age of 8.1 ± 3.8 years. MOCO PSIR had higher SNR and CNR than the single-shot TrueFISP PSIR (p
ISSN:0009-9260
1365-229X
DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2021.01.018