Acute Myocardial Infarction Cohorts Defined by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision Versus Diagnosis-Related Groups: Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement and Quality Measures in an Integrated Health System

Among Medicare value-based payment programs for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program uses ( ) codes to identify the program denominator, while the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced program uses diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). The extent to whic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes 2021-03, Vol.14 (3), p.e006570-e006570
Hauptverfasser: Levy, Andrew E., Hammes, Andrew, Anoff, Debra L., Raines, Joshua D., Beck, Natalie M., Rudofker, Eric W., Marshall, Kimberly J., Nensel, Jessica D., Messenger, John C., Masoudi, Frederick A., Pierce, Read G., Allen, Larry A., Ream, Karen S., Ho, P. Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Among Medicare value-based payment programs for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program uses ( ) codes to identify the program denominator, while the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced program uses diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). The extent to which these programs target similar patients, whether they target the intended population (type 1 myocardial infarction), and whether outcomes are comparable between cohorts is not known. In a retrospective study of 2176 patients hospitalized in an integrated health system, a cohort of patients assigned a principal diagnosis of AMI and a cohort of patients assigned an AMI DRG were compared according to patient-level agreement and outcomes such as mortality and readmission. One thousand nine hundred thirty-five patients were included in the cohort compared with 662 patients in the DRG cohort. Only 421 patients were included in both AMI cohorts (19.3% agreement). DRG cohort patients were older (70 versus 65 years,
ISSN:1941-7705
1941-7713
1941-7705
DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006570