Desorption ionization using through‐hole alumina membrane offers higher reproducibility than 2,5‐dihydroxybenzoic acid, a widely used matrix in Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry imaging analysis

Rationale DIUTHAME (desorption ionization using through‐hole alumina membrane), a recently developed matrix‐free ionization‐assisting substrate, was examined for reproducibility in terms of mass accuracy and intensity using standard lipid and mouse brain sections. The impregnation property of DIUTHA...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rapid communications in mass spectrometry 2021-05, Vol.35 (10), p.e9076-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Hasan, Md. Mahmudul, Eto, Fumihiro, Mamun, Md. Al, Sato, Shumpei, Islam, Ariful, Waliullah, A.S.M., Chi, Do Huu, Takahashi, Yutaka, Kahyo, Tomoaki, Naito, Yasuhide, Kotani, Masahiro, Ohmura, Takayuki, Setou, Mitsutoshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Rationale DIUTHAME (desorption ionization using through‐hole alumina membrane), a recently developed matrix‐free ionization‐assisting substrate, was examined for reproducibility in terms of mass accuracy and intensity using standard lipid and mouse brain sections. The impregnation property of DIUTHAME significantly improved the reproducibility of mass accuracy and intensity compared with 2,5‐dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB). Methods Frozen tissue sections were mounted on indium tin oxide‐coated glass slides. DIUTHAME and DHB were applied to individual sections. Subsequently, a solution of a phosphatidylcholine standard, PC(18:2/18:2), was poured onto the DIUTHAME and matrix. Finally, the samples were subjected to laser desorption ionization coupled with Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. The reproducibility was tested by calculating the mean ± standard deviation values of mass errors and intensities of individual ion species. Results Analysis of the PC(18:2/18:2) standard showed significantly (p 
ISSN:0951-4198
1097-0231
DOI:10.1002/rcm.9076