Functional outcome after single-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction with rib cartilage grafting

Single-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction (SSLTR) provides a definite surgical treatment for patients with complex glotto-subglottic stenosis. To date, the influence of SSLTR on the functional outcome after surgery has not been analyzed. A retrospective analysis of all patients receiving a SSLTR b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2022-01, Vol.163 (1), p.313-322.e3
Hauptverfasser: Schweiger, Thomas, Roesner, Imme, de Faria Soares Rodrigues, Isaac, Evermann, Matthias, Frick, Anna Elisabeth, Denk-Linnert, Doris-Maria, Klepetko, Walter, Hoetzenecker, Konrad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Single-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction (SSLTR) provides a definite surgical treatment for patients with complex glotto-subglottic stenosis. To date, the influence of SSLTR on the functional outcome after surgery has not been analyzed. A retrospective analysis of all patients receiving a SSLTR between November 2012 and October 2019 was performed. Preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively, patients received a full functional evaluation, including spirometry; voice measurements (eg, fundamental frequency; dynamic range, singing voice range, and perceptual voice evaluation using the Roughness-Breathiness-Hoarseness [RBH] score, and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing [FEES]). A total of 15 patients with a mean age of 45 ± 17 years underwent SSTLR. Two (13%) patients were men and 13 (87%) were women. The majority of patients (67%) had undergone previous surgical or endoscopic treatment attempts that had failed. At the 3-month follow-up visit, none of the patients had signs of penetration or aspiration in their swallowing examination. Voice measurements revealed a significantly lower fundamental voice frequency (201.0 Hz vs 155.5 Hz; P = .006), whereas voice range (19.1 semitones vs 14.9 semitones; P = .200) and dynamic range (52.5 dB vs 53.0 dB; P = .777) was hardly affected. The median RBH score changed from R1 B0 H1 to R2 B1 H2. In spirometry, breathing capacity increased significantly (peak expiratory flow, 44% vs 87% [P 
ISSN:0022-5223
1097-685X
DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.11.155