Effects of gadobutrol on background parenchymal enhancement and differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lesions in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast

Background The high concentration of gadolinium in gadobutrol, which is widely used in Japan, helps visualize signal enhancement of neoplastic lesions, however, there was concern that high T1 relaxivity could decrease the contrast between the lesion and the background mammary gland. We evaluate the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) Japan), 2021-07, Vol.28 (4), p.927-936
Hauptverfasser: Tozaki, Mitsuhiro, Yabuuchi, Hidetake, Goto, Mariko, Sasaki, Michiro, Kubota, Kazunori, Nakahara, Hiroshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The high concentration of gadolinium in gadobutrol, which is widely used in Japan, helps visualize signal enhancement of neoplastic lesions, however, there was concern that high T1 relaxivity could decrease the contrast between the lesion and the background mammary gland. We evaluate the effect of gadobutrol on background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lesions in dynamic MRI of the breast. Methods Ninety-nine patients were enrolled prospectively. Measurements of the following signal intensities (SIs) were obtained: breast tissue on a pre-contrast image (SI pre ) and an early-phase image (SI early ); and the SIs of breast cancer on a pre-contrast image (SI pre-cancer ) and an early-phase image (SI early-cancer ). We calculated the BPE ratio, i.e., (SI early  − SI pre )/SI pre and the cancer/BPE ratio, i.e., (SI early-cancer  − SI pre-cancer )/(SI early on the affected side − SI pre on the affected side). These quantitative assessments were compared with the data from the recently published multicenter study (reference study without use of gadobutrol). In addition, two radiologists reinterpreted each of the MR images, and a third radiologist set the ROIs in the lesions and performed kinetic analysis as a Reader 3. Results While there was no significant difference in the SI of breast cancer in the premenopausal patients between the two studies, that in postmenopausal patients was significantly higher in the present study than in the reference study ( p  = 0.002). Although there was no significant difference in the cancer/BPE ratio in the postmenopausal patients between the two studies, the cancer/BPE ratio in the premenopausal patients was significantly higher in the reference study than in the present study ( p  = 0.028). For differentiation between benign and malignant masses, the mass margin was found to be the most important term ( p  
ISSN:1340-6868
1880-4233
DOI:10.1007/s12282-021-01229-w