Efficacy of Transnasal Endoscopic Fine‐Needle Aspiration Biopsy in Diagnosing Submucosal Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Objectives/Hypothesis The routine practices of examining submucosal lesions are not suitable for deep lesions. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of non‐real‐time image‐guided transnasal endoscopic fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in diagnosing nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with submucosal le...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2021-08, Vol.131 (8), p.1798-1804
Hauptverfasser: Tang, Qing‐Nan, Tang, Lin‐Quan, Liu, Li‐Ting, Wen, Dong‐Xiang, Lu, Zi‐Jian, Ou, Guo‐Ping, Yan, Jin‐Jie, Yang, Jin‐Hao, Li, Ji‐Bin, Wen, Yue‐Feng, Guo, Shan‐Shan, Liu, Sai‐Lan, Xie, Hao‐Jun, Sun, Xue‐Song, Li, Xiao‐Yun, Chen, Qiu‐Yan, Mai, Hai‐Qiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives/Hypothesis The routine practices of examining submucosal lesions are not suitable for deep lesions. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of non‐real‐time image‐guided transnasal endoscopic fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in diagnosing nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with submucosal lesions. Study Design The effectiveness evaluation of diagnostic methods. Methods Fifty suspected NPC patients who failed in conventional biopsies were enrolled in this study. The efficacy, maneuverability, and safety of FNAB in diagnosing these intractable cases were evaluated. Results The definitive diagnostic results of these 50 patients were NPC (34/50, 68.0%), nasopharyngeal necrosis (1/50, 2.0%), nasopharyngeal mucositis (12/50, 24.0%), and other cancers (3/50, 6.0%), respectively. The results of the diagnostic efficacy of FNAB were sensitivity, 89.2%; specificity, 100.0%; positive predictive value, 100.0%; negative predictive value, 76.5%; and accuracy, 92.0%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was 0.946 (95% confidence interval = 0.884–1.00, P 
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.29433