Treatment of symptomatic Chiari I malformation by "all-factors-surgery": a report of 194 cases

Purpose Inadequate decompressions can lead to poor improvement of symptoms in patients with Chiari I malformation (CMI). In this study, the “all-factors-surgery” that including all levels decompressions was performed on symptomatic CMI patients for the snake of eliminating all possible pathogenic fa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European spine journal 2021-06, Vol.30 (6), p.1615-1622
Hauptverfasser: Chu, Weihua, Chen, Xin, Xue, Xingsen, He, Guangjian, Liu, Jingjing, Zhang, Hongyan, Feng, Hua, Lin, Jiangkai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Inadequate decompressions can lead to poor improvement of symptoms in patients with Chiari I malformation (CMI). In this study, the “all-factors-surgery” that including all levels decompressions was performed on symptomatic CMI patients for the snake of eliminating all possible pathogenic factors and reducing the chance of reoperation. Methods The “all-factors-surgery” combined operations of posterior fossa decompression, enlarged cranioplasty, duraplasty, cerebellar tonsil partial resection and adhesion release. Total 194 patients from January 2010 to December 2015. The outcome measures included improvement rate of symptoms, patients self-evaluation (improved, unchanged, worsened), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS) score, the diameter of the syrinx and complications. Results Postoperative data were collected from the three stages: at discharge, the short-term follow-up (average, 9.39 months), and the long-term follow-up (average, 54.44 months). Patients self-evaluation improvement rate in the three follow-up stages was 92.27%, 90.07% and 85.93%. The VAS scores (mean, 1.49, 1.21, 1.47 vs 3.76) and JOA scores (mean, 15.66, 15.99, 16.10 vs 14.84) were significant difference between the follow-up and pre-operation ( P  
ISSN:0940-6719
1432-0932
DOI:10.1007/s00586-021-06720-8