Long-term effects of laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection on urinary retention in rectal cancer

Background The addition of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) in rectal cancer surgery has been reported to increase the incidence of post-operative urinary retention. Here, we assessed the predictive factors and long-term outcomes of urinary retention following laparoscopic LPLND (L-LPLND...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2022-02, Vol.36 (2), p.999-1007
Hauptverfasser: Sadakari, Yoshihiko, Hisano, Kyoko, Sada, Masafumi, Mizuuchi, Yusuke, Nagayoshi, Kinuko, Fujita, Hayato, Nagai, Shuntaro, Manabe, Tatsuya, Ueki, Takashi, Nakamura, Masafumi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The addition of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) in rectal cancer surgery has been reported to increase the incidence of post-operative urinary retention. Here, we assessed the predictive factors and long-term outcomes of urinary retention following laparoscopic LPLND (L-LPLND) with total mesorectal excision (TME) for advanced lower rectal cancer. Methods This retrospective single-institutional study reviewed post-operative urinary retention in 71 patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent L-LPLND with TME. Patients with preoperative urinary dysfunction or who underwent unilateral LPLND were excluded. Detailed information regarding patient clinicopathologic characteristics, post-void residual urine volume, and the presence or absence of urinary retention over time was collected from clinical and histopathologic reports and telephone surveys. Urinary retention was defined as residual urine > 100 mL and the need for further treatment. Results Post-operative urinary retention was observed in 25/71 patients (35.2%). Multivariate analysis revealed that blood loss ≥ 400 mL [odds ratio (OR) 4.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24–16.43; p  = 0.018] and inferior vesical artery (IVA) resection (OR 8.28; 95% CI 2.46–27.81; p  
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-021-08364-7