Missed Incidental Pulmonary Embolism: Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Assess Prevalence and Improve Quality Improvement Opportunities

Incidental pulmonary embolism (IPE) can be found on body CT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using artificial intelligence to identify missed IPE on a large number of CT examinations. This retrospective analysis included all single-phase chest, abdominal, and pelvic (CAP) an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Radiology 2021-07, Vol.18 (7), p.992-999
Hauptverfasser: Wildman-Tobriner, Benjamin, Ngo, Lawrence, Mammarappallil, Joseph G., Konkel, Brandon, Johnson, Jacob M., Bashir, Mustafa R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Incidental pulmonary embolism (IPE) can be found on body CT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using artificial intelligence to identify missed IPE on a large number of CT examinations. This retrospective analysis included all single-phase chest, abdominal, and pelvic (CAP) and abdominal and pelvic (AP) CT examinations performed at a single center over 1 year, for indications other than identification of PE. Proprietary visual classification and natural language processing software was used to analyze images and reports from all CT examinations, followed by a two-step human adjudication process to classify cases as true positive, false positive, true negative, or false negative. Descriptive statistics were assessed for prevalence of IPE and features (subsegmental versus central, unifocal versus multifocal, right heart strain or not) of missed IPE. Interrater agreement for radiologist readers was also calculated. A total of 11,913 CT examinations (6,398 CAP, 5,515 AP) were included. Thirty false-negative examinations were identified on CAP (0.47%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32%-0.67%) and nineteen false-negative studies on AP (0.34%; 95% CI, 0.21%-0.54%) studies. During manual review, readers showed substantial agreement for identification of IPE on CAP (κ = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.86) and nearly perfect agreement for identification of IPE on AP (κ = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.97). Forty-nine missed IPEs (0.41%; 95% CI, 0.30%-0.54%) were ultimately identified, compared with seventy-nine IPEs (0.66%; 95% CI, 0.53%-0.83%) identified at initial clinical interpretation. Artificial intelligence can efficiently analyze CT examinations to identify potential missed IPE. These results can inform peer-review efforts and quality control and could potentially be implemented in a prospective fashion. [Display omitted]
ISSN:1546-1440
1558-349X
DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2021.01.014