Contact dermatitis associated with preservatives: Retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 1994 through 2016

Preservatives are often necessary components of commercial products. Large-scale North American studies on preservative allergy are limited. To evaluate demographics, positive patch test reactions (PPTRs), clinical relevance, and trends for preservatives tested by the North American Contact Dermatit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2021-04, Vol.84 (4), p.965-976
Hauptverfasser: Atwater, Amber Reck, Petty, Amy J., Liu, Beiyu, Green, Cynthia L., Silverberg, Jonathan I., DeKoven, Joel G., Belsito, Donald V., Reeder, Margo J., Sasseville, Denis, Taylor, James S., Maibach, Howard I., Zirwas, Matthew J., Marks, James G., Zug, Kathryn A., Fowler, Joseph F., Pratt, Melanie D., DeLeo, Vincent A., Warshaw, Erin M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Preservatives are often necessary components of commercial products. Large-scale North American studies on preservative allergy are limited. To evaluate demographics, positive patch test reactions (PPTRs), clinical relevance, and trends for preservatives tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch testing results of preservatives from 1994 through 2016. A total of 50,799 patients were tested; 11,338 (22.3%) had a PPTR to at least 1 preservative. The most frequent reactions were to methylisothiazolinone 0.2% aqueous (aq) (12.2%), formaldehyde 2% aq (7.8%), formaldehyde 1% aq (7.8%), quaternium-15 2% petrolatum (pet) (7.7%), and methyldibromo glutaronitrile/phenoxyethanol 2% pet (5.1%). Paraben mix 12% pet (1%), iodopropynyl butylcarbamate 0.1% pet (0.4%), benzyl alcohol 1% pet (0.3%), and phenoxyethanol 1% pet (0.2%) had the lowest PPTRs. Linear regression analysis of preservatives tested showed that only methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone 0.01% aq (parameter estimate, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.17-0.66; P 
ISSN:0190-9622
1097-6787
1097-6787
DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.07.059