Evaluation of A2 and A4 Hand Pulley Repair Using Tendon Graft Rings

To compare the mechanical characteristics of A2 and combined A2–A4 pulley repair in the intact and damaged flexor pulley system. After control testing, we recorded tendon excursion and flexion of 11 cadaveric fingers after several interventions: (1) complete excision of A2 and A4, (2) repair of the A2 with one ring of tendon graft, (3) repair of the A2 with 2 rings of tendon graft, and (4) repair of the A2 with 2 rings combined with repair the A4 with one ring. At the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, the maximum rotational angle decreased by an average of 30% after complete excision of the A2 and A4 pulleys. This angle was still decreased compared with the control by an average of 25% after one-ring repair at A2, 23% after 2-ring repair at A2, and 17% after 2-ring repair at A2 combined with one-ring repair at A4. At the metacarpophalangeal joint, the average maximum rotational angle decreased by an average of 17% after complete excision of the A2 and A4 pulleys. This angle was still decreased compared with the control by an average of 11% after one-ring repair at A2, 7% after 2-ring repair at A2, and 4% after 2-ring repair at A2 combined with one-ring repair at A4. Kinematic behavior at the PIP joint with an intact pulley system was most closely approximated by the 3-loop repair. The least similar behavior was with a 2-ring construct at A2. All repairs increased average flexion at the PIP and metacarpophalangeal joints compared with the unrepaired samples. The 3-ring configuration exhibited a higher recovery of PIP flexion compared with the other repairs. Although each repair restored flexion, clinical studies are necessary to evaluate the clinical relevance of the mechanical results of this study.