The moderating effects of self and other mentalizing on the relationship between distress and disordered eating: A cross‐cultural examination

Objective Cross‐cultural comparisons that focus on underlying psychological mechanisms in disordered eating (DE) are lacking. With the aim of addressing this gap, we investigated the interplay between mentalizing, distress, and DE in two cultural groups: the ultra‐Orthodox and secular Jewish societi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical psychology 2021-09, Vol.77 (9), p.1937-1953
Hauptverfasser: Aival‐Naveh, Erez, Rothschild‐Yakar, Lily, Kurman, Jenny
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective Cross‐cultural comparisons that focus on underlying psychological mechanisms in disordered eating (DE) are lacking. With the aim of addressing this gap, we investigated the interplay between mentalizing, distress, and DE in two cultural groups: the ultra‐Orthodox and secular Jewish societies in Israel. Method A combination of performance‐based and self‐report measures of two mentalizing‐related constructs (emotional awareness and alexithymia), along with self‐report measures of distress, DE, and values preferences, were employed in a community sample (N = 300) of ultra‐Orthodox and secular Jewish women. Results Distress predicted DE in both cultural groups, yet there were cultural differences in the moderating role of mentalizing. Both mentalizing measures moderated the distress‒DE link in the secular group, but not in the ultra‐Orthodox group. Furthermore, there were cultural differences in the moderating effects of self versus other mentalizing. Conclusions The results suggest cultural differences in the underlying psychological mechanism of DE.
ISSN:0021-9762
1097-4679
DOI:10.1002/jclp.23121