Influence of different physiological hemodynamics on fractional flow reserve values in the left coronary artery and right coronary artery

Background Although the left coronary artery (LCA) has a flow profile in that most blood flow occurs during diastole rather than systole, the right coronary artery (RCA) has a flow pattern that is less diastolic dominant. This study assessed whether coronary pressure waveforms distal to stenoses wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart and vessels 2021-08, Vol.36 (8), p.1125-1131
Hauptverfasser: Wada, Kensaku, Fujii, Kenichi, Horitani, Keita, Kishimoto, Hiroshi, Hashimoto, Kenta, Shibutani, Hiroki, Tsujimoto, Satoshi, Matsumura, Koichiro, Otagaki, Munemitsu, Morishita, Shun, Iwasaki, Masayoshi, Shiojima, Ichiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Although the left coronary artery (LCA) has a flow profile in that most blood flow occurs during diastole rather than systole, the right coronary artery (RCA) has a flow pattern that is less diastolic dominant. This study assessed whether coronary pressure waveforms distal to stenoses with the same fractional flow reserve (FFR) was the same between the LCA and RCA. Methods A total of 347 vessels from 318 patients who underwent FFR measurements were included. Conventional FFR was calculated as the ratio of the mean coronary distal pressure (Pd) to the mean aortic pressure (Pa) at maximal hyperemia. The pressure drop ratios in systole (PDR systole ) and diastole (PDR diastole ) were calculated as the sum of (Pa minus Pd) divided by the sum of Pa at the intracoronary diastolic and systolic pressure phases, respectively. Results Analysis of covariance of the regression line of correlation between conventional FFR and PDR systole revealed that the slope was significantly greater in the RCA than in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and left circumflex artery (LCX) (−0.765, −0.578, and −0.589, p  
ISSN:0910-8327
1615-2573
DOI:10.1007/s00380-021-01797-z