Convolutional neural network in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: how good is automatic delineation for primary tumor on a non-contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI?

Purpose Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) show potential for delineating cancers on contrast-enhanced MRI (ce-MRI) but there are clinical scenarios in which administration of contrast is not desirable. We investigated performance of the CNN for delineating primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Japanese journal of radiology 2021-06, Vol.39 (6), p.571-579
Hauptverfasser: Wong, Lun M., Ai, Qi Yong H., Mo, Frankie K. F., Poon, Darren M. C., King, Ann D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) show potential for delineating cancers on contrast-enhanced MRI (ce-MRI) but there are clinical scenarios in which administration of contrast is not desirable. We investigated performance of the CNN for delineating primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) on non-contrast-enhanced images and compared the performance to that on ce-MRI. Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed primary NPC in 195 patients using a well-established CNN, U-Net, for tumor delineation on the non-contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed (fs)-T2W, ce-T1W and ce-fs-T1W images. The CNN-derived delineations were compared to manual delineations to obtain Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average surface distance (ASD). The DSC and ASD on fs-T2W were compared to those on ce-MRI. Primary tumor volumes (PTVs) of CNN-derived delineations were compared to that of manual delineations. Results The CNN for NPC delineation on fs-T2W images showed similar DSC (0.71 ± 0.09) and ASD (0.21 ± 0.48 cm) to those on ce-T1W images (0.71 ± 0.09 and 0.17 ± 0.19 cm, respectively) ( p  > 0.05), and lower DSC but similar ASD to ce-fs-T1W images (0.73 ± 0.09, p   0.05). The CNN overestimated PTVs on all sequences ( p  
ISSN:1867-1071
1867-108X
DOI:10.1007/s11604-021-01092-x