Discrepancy between CARTO and Rhythmia maps for defining the left atrial low-voltage areas in atrial fibrillation ablation
Reported mapping procedures of left atrial (LA) low-voltage areas (LVAs) vary widely. This study aimed to compare the PentaRay ® /CARTO ® 3 (PentaRay map) and Orion™/Rhythmia™ (Orion map) systems for LA voltage mapping. This study included 15 patients who underwent successful pulmonary vein isolatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heart and vessels 2021-07, Vol.36 (7), p.1027-1034 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Reported mapping procedures of left atrial (LA) low-voltage areas (LVAs) vary widely. This study aimed to compare the PentaRay
®
/CARTO
®
3 (PentaRay map) and Orion™/Rhythmia™ (Orion map) systems for LA voltage mapping. This study included 15 patients who underwent successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation. After PVI, PentaRay and Orion maps created for all patients were compared. LVAs were defined as sites with ≥ 3 adjacent low-voltage points 0.5 mV were properly recorded at the septum and posterolateral sites during appropriate beats in the PentaRay map. The PentaRay map had a shorter procedure time than the Orion map (12 ± 3 min vs. 23 ± 8 min, respectively;
p
0.5-mV electrograms were properly recorded in the PentaRay map. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0910-8327 1615-2573 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00380-021-01773-7 |