Discrepancy between CARTO and Rhythmia maps for defining the left atrial low-voltage areas in atrial fibrillation ablation

Reported mapping procedures of left atrial (LA) low-voltage areas (LVAs) vary widely. This study aimed to compare the PentaRay ® /CARTO ® 3 (PentaRay map) and Orion™/Rhythmia™ (Orion map) systems for LA voltage mapping. This study included 15 patients who underwent successful pulmonary vein isolatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart and vessels 2021-07, Vol.36 (7), p.1027-1034
Hauptverfasser: Kaseno, Kenichi, Hasegawa, Kanae, Miyazaki, Shinsuke, Mukai, Moe, Aoyama, Daisetsu, Nodera, Minoru, Hirano, Koudai, Otake, Mika, Nomura, Ryouhei, Miyahara, Kousuke, Ishikawa, Rie, Matsui, Akira, Yamaguchi, Junya, Shiomi, Yuichiro, Tama, Naoto, Ikeda, Hiroyuki, Fukuoka, Yoshitomo, Ishida, Kentaro, Uzui, Hiroyasu, Tada, Hiroshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Reported mapping procedures of left atrial (LA) low-voltage areas (LVAs) vary widely. This study aimed to compare the PentaRay ® /CARTO ® 3 (PentaRay map) and Orion™/Rhythmia™ (Orion map) systems for LA voltage mapping. This study included 15 patients who underwent successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation. After PVI, PentaRay and Orion maps created for all patients were compared. LVAs were defined as sites with ≥ 3 adjacent low-voltage points  0.5 mV were properly recorded at the septum and posterolateral sites during appropriate beats in the PentaRay map. The PentaRay map had a shorter procedure time than the Orion map (12 ± 3 min vs. 23 ± 8 min, respectively; p   0.5-mV electrograms were properly recorded in the PentaRay map.
ISSN:0910-8327
1615-2573
DOI:10.1007/s00380-021-01773-7